PLATO
THE SEVENTH LETTER
360 BC
IN TWO WEB-PAGE PARTS - PART TWO
TRANSLATED BY
J. Harward
PLATO |
|
Plato (Greek Pláton, "broad" 428/427
BC - 348/347 BC), was a Classical Greek philosopher,
mathematician, student of Socrates, writer
of philosophical dialogues, and founder of
the Academy in Athens, the first institution
of higher learning in the Western world.
Along with his mentor, Socrates, and his
student, Aristotle, Plato helped to lay the
foundations of Western philosophy and science
|
|
>
THE SEVENTH LETTER
>The Seventh Letter of Plato is an epistle
that tradition has ascribed to Plato. It
is by far the longest of the epistles of
Plato and gives an autobiographical account
of his activities in Sicily as part of the
intrigues between Dion and Dionysius of Syracuse
for the tyranny of Syracuse. It also contains
an extended philosophical interlude concerning
the possibility of writing true philosophical
works and the theory of forms. Assuming that
the letter is authentic, it was written after
Dion was assassinated by Calippus in 353
BC and before he was in turn overthrown a
year later.
Of all the letters attributed to Plato, the
Seventh Letter is most widely recognized
as authentic. The main objections to its
authenticity involve its statement that there
are forms or ideas of artificial things,
whereas Aristotle attributes to Plato the
idea that there are forms or ideas only of
natural things, as well as the fact that
the letter's purported historical setting
seems unlikely: the letter implies that Dion's
followers wrote to Plato asking him for practical
political advice while at the same time insinuating
that he had not been loyal to Dion, that
Calippus permitted the letter to get to Plato,
and that Plato replied by recounting in detail
recent history to people who were immediately
involved in those events and included in
his advice a long digression on the theory
of forms. These problems lead R. G. Bury
to conclude that the letter was an open letter
intended to defend Plato in the eyes of his
fellow Athenians rather than to be sent to
Dion's followers in Sicily; there probably
never was any letter from them to Plato,
he says. Nevertheless, the Seventh Letter
has recently been argued to be spurious by
prominent scholars, such as Malcolm Schofield,
Myles Burnyeat, George Boas, Terence Irwin,[5]
and Julia Annas. According to Annas, the
Seventh Letter is "such an unconvincing
production that its acceptance by many scholars
is best seen as indicating the strength of
their desire to find, behind the detachment
of the dialogues, something, no matter what,
to which Plato is straightforwardly committed."(wikipedia)
|
THE SEVENTH LETTER
360 BC |
| PLATO TO THE RELATIVES AND FRIENDS OF DION.
WELFARE. |
PART TWO
And now, for good luck's sake, let us on
this third venture abstain from words of
ill omen. But, nevertheless, I advise you,
his friends, to imitate in Dion his love
for his country and his temperate habits
of daily life, and to try with better auspices
to carry out his wishes-what these were,
you have heard from me in plain words. And
whoever among you cannot live the simple
Dorian life according to the customs of your
forefathers, but follows the manner of life
of Dion's murderers and of the Sicilians,
do not invite this man to join you, or expect
him to do any loyal or salutary act; but
invite all others to the work of resettling
all the States of Sicily and establishing
equality under the laws, summoning them from
Sicily itself and from the whole Peloponnese-and
have no fear even of Athens; for there, also,
are men who excel all mankind in their devotion
to virtue and in hatred of the reckless acts
of those who shed the blood of friends.
But if, after all, this is work for a future
time, whereas immediate action is called
for by the disorders of all sorts and kinds
which arise every day from your state of
civil strife, every man to whom Providence
has given even a moderate share of right
intelligence ought to know that in times
of civil strife there is no respite from
trouble till the victors make an end of feeding
their grudge by combats and banishments and
executions, and of wreaking their vengeance
on their enemies. They should master themselves
and, enacting impartial laws, framed not
to gratify themselves more than the conquered
party, should compel men to obey these by
two restraining forces, respect and fear;
fear, because they are the masters and can
display superior force; respect, because
they rise superior to pleasures and are willing
and able to be servants to the laws.
There is no other way save this for terminating
the troubles of a city that is in a state
of civil strife; but a constant continuance
of internal disorders, struggles, hatred
and mutual distrust is the common lot of
cities which are in that plight. Therefore,
those who have for the time being gained
the upper hand, when they desire to secure
their position, must by their own act and
choice select from all Hellas men whom they
have ascertained to be the best for the purpose.
These must in the first place be men of mature
years, who have children and wives at home,
and, as far as possible, a long line of ancestors
of good repute, and all must be possessed
of sufficient property. For a city of ten
thousand householders their numbers should
be fifty; that is enough. These they must
induce to come from their own homes by entreaties
and the promise of the highest honours; and
having induced them to come they must entreat
and command them to draw up laws after binding
themselves by oath to show no partiality
either to conquerors or to conquered, but
to give equal and common rights to the whole
State.
When laws have been enacted, what everything
then hinges on is this. If the conquerors
show more obedience to the laws than the
conquered, the whole State will be full of
security and happiness, and there will be
an escape from all your troubles. But if
they do not, then do not summon me or any
other helper to aid you against those who
do not obey the counsel I now give you. For
this course is akin to that which Dion and
I attempted to carry out with our hearts
set on the welfare of Syracuse. It is indeed
a second best course. The first and best
was that scheme of welfare to all mankind
which we attempted to carry out with the
co- operation of Dionysios; but some chance,
mightier than men, brought it to nothing.
Do you now, with good fortune attending you
and with Heaven's help, try to bring your
efforts to a happier issue. Let this be the
end of my advice and injunction and of the
narrative of my first visit to Dionysios.
Whoever wishes may next hear of my second
journey and voyage, and learn that it was
a reasonable and suitable proceeding. My
first period of residence in Sicily was occupied
in the way which I related before giving
my advice to the relatives and friends of
Dion.
After those events I persuaded Dionysios
by such arguments as I could to let me go;
and we made an agreement as to what should
be done when peace was made; for at that
time there was a state of war in Sicily.
Dionysios said that, when he had put the
affairs of his empire in a position of greater
safety for himself, he would send for Dion
and me again; and he desired that Dion should
regard what had befallen him not as an exile,
but as a change of residence. I agreed to
come again on these conditions. When peace
had been made, he began sending for me; he
requested that Dion should wait for another
year, but begged that I should by all means
come. Dion now kept urging and entreating
me to go. For persistent rumours came from
Sicily that Dionysios was now once more possessed
by an extraordinary desire for philosophy.
For this reason Dion pressed me urgently
not to decline his invitation. But though
I was well aware that as regards philosophy
such symptoms were not uncommon in young
men, still it seemed to me safer at that
time to part company altogether with Dion
and Dionysios; and I offended both of them
by replying that I was an old man, and that
the steps now being taken were quite at variance
with the previous agreement.
After this, it seems, Archytes came to the
court of Dionysios. Before my departure I
had brought him and his Tarentine circle
into friendly relations with Dionysios. There
were some others in Syracuse who had received
some instruction from Dion, and others had
learnt from these, getting their heads full
of erroneous teaching on philosophical questions.
These, it seems, were attempting to hold
discussions with Dionysios on questions connected
with such subjects, in the idea that he had
been fully instructed in my views. Now is
not at all devoid of natural gifts for learning,
and he has a great craving for honour and
glory. What was said probably pleased him,
and he felt some shame when it became clear
that he had not taken advantage of my teaching
during my visit. For these reasons he conceived
a desire for more definite instruction, and
his love of glory was an additional incentive
to him. The real reasons why he had learnt
nothing during my previous visit have just
been set forth in the preceding narrative.
Accordingly, now that I was safe at home
and had refused his second invitation, as
I just now related, Dionysios seems to have
felt all manner of anxiety lest certain people
should suppose that I was unwilling to visit
him again because I had formed a poor opinion
of his natural gifts and character, and because,
knowing as I did his manner of life, I disapproved
of it. It is right for me to speak the truth,
and make no complaint if anyone, after hearing
the facts, forms a poor opinion of my philosophy,
and thinks that the tyrant was in the right.
Dionysios now invited me for the third time,
sending a trireme to ensure me comfort on
the voyage; he sent also Archedemos-one of
those who had spent some time with Archytes,
and of whom he supposed that I had a higher
opinion than of any of the Sicilian Greeks-and,
with him, other men of repute in Sicily.
These all brought the same report, that Dionysios
had made progress in philosophy. He also
sent a very long letter, knowing as he did
my relations with Dion and Dion's eagerness
also that I should take ship and go to Syracuse.
The letter was framed in its opening sentences
to meet all these conditions, and the tenor
of it was as follows: "Dionysios to
Plato," here followed the customary
greeting and immediately after it he said,
"If in compliance with our request you
come now, in the first place, Dion's affairs
will be dealt with in whatever way you yourself
desire; I know that you will desire what
is reasonable, and I shall consent to it.
But if not, none of Dion's affairs will have
results in accordance with your wishes, with
regard either to Dion himself or to other
matters." This he said in these words;
the rest it would be tedious and inopportune
to quote.
Other letters arrived from Archytes and the
Tarentines, praising the philosophical studies
of Dionysios and saying that, if I did not
now come, I should cause a complete rupture
in their friendship with Dionysios, which
had been brought about by me and was of no
small importance to their political interests.
When this invitation came to me at that time
in such terms, and those who had come from
Sicily and Italy were trying to drag me thither,
while my friends at Athens were literally
pushing me out with their urgent entreaties,
it was the same old tale-that I must not
betray Dion and my Tarentine friends and
supporters. Also I myself had a lurking feeling
that there was nothing surprising in the
fact that a young man, quick to learn, hearing
talk of the great truths of philosophy, should
feel a craving for the higher life. I thought
therefore that I must put the matter definitely
to the test to see whether his desire was
genuine or the reverse, and on no account
leave such an impulse unaided nor make myself
responsible for such a deep and real disgrace,
if the reports brought by anyone were really
true. So blindfolding myself with this reflection,
I set out, with many fears and with no very
favourable anticipations, as was natural
enough. However, I went, and my action on
this occasion at any rate was really a case
of "the third to the Preserver,"
for I had the good fortune to return safely;
and for this I must, next to the God, thank
Dionysios, because, though many wished to
make an end of me, he prevented them and
paid some proper respect to my situation.
On my arrival, I thought that first I must
put to the test the question whether Dionysios
had really been kindled with the fire of
philosophy, or whether all the reports which
had come to Athens were empty rumours. Now
there is a way of putting such things to
the test which is not to be despised and
is well suited to monarchs, especially to
those who have got their heads full of erroneous
teaching, which immediately my arrival I
found to be very much the case with Dionysios.
One should show such men what philosophy
is in all its extent; what their range of
studies is by which it is approached, and
how much labour it involves. For the man
who has heard this, if he has the true philosophic
spirit and that godlike temperament which
makes him a kin to philosophy and worthy
of it, thinks that he has been told of a
marvellous road lying before him, that he
must forthwith press on with all his strength,
and that life is not worth living if he does
anything else.
After this he uses to the full his own powers
and those of his guide in the path, and relaxes
not his efforts, till he has either reached
the end of the whole course of study or gained
such power that he is not incapable of directing
his steps without the aid of a guide. This
is the spirit and these are the thoughts
by which such a man guides his life, carrying
out his work, whatever his occupation may
be, but throughout it all ever cleaving to
philosophy and to such rules of diet in his
daily life as will give him inward sobriety
and therewith quickness in learning, a good
memory, and reasoning power; the kind of
life which is opposed to this he consistently
hates. Those who have not the true philosophic
temper, but a mere surface colouring of opinions
penetrating, like sunburn, only skin deep,
when they see how great the range of studies
is, how much labour is involved in it, and
how necessary to the pursuit it is to have
an orderly regulation of the daily life,
come to the conclusion that the thing is
difficult and impossible for them, and are
actually incapable of carrying out the course
of study; while some of them persuade themselves
that they have sufficiently studied the whole
matter and have no need of any further effort.
This is the sure test and is the safest one
to apply to those who live in luxury and
are incapable of continuous effort; it ensures
that such a man shall not throw the blame
upon his teacher but on himself, because
he cannot bring to the pursuit all the qualities
necessary to it.
Thus it came about that I said to Dionysios
what I did say on that occasion. I did not,
however, give a complete exposition, nor
did Dionysios ask for one. For he professed
to know many, and those the most important,
points, and to have a sufficient hold of
them through instruction given by others.
I hear also that he has since written about
what he heard from me, composing what professes
to be his own handbook, very different, so
he says, from the doctrines which he heard
from me; but of its contents I know nothing;
I know indeed that others have written on
the same subjects; but who they are, is more
than they know themselves.
Thus much at least, I can say about all writers,
past or future, who say they know the things
to which I devote myself, whether by hearing
the teaching of me or of others, or by their
own discoveries-that according to my view
it is not possible for them to have any real
skill in the matter. There neither is nor
ever will be a treatise of mine on the subject.
For it does not admit of exposition like
other branches of knowledge; but after much
converse about the matter itself and a life
lived together, suddenly a light, as it were,
is kindled in one soul by a flame that leaps
to it from another, and thereafter sustains
itself. Yet this much I know-that if the
things were written or put into words, it
would be done best by me, and that, if they
were written badly, I should be the person
most pained.
Again, if they had appeared to me to admit
adequately of writing and exposition, what
task in life could I have performed nobler
than this, to write what is of great service
to mankind and to bring the nature of things
into the light for all to see? But I do not
think it a good thing for men that there
should be a disquisition, as it is called,
on this topic-except for some few, who are
able with a little teaching to find it out
for themselves. As for the rest, it would
fill some of them quite illogically with
a mistaken feeling of contempt, and others
with lofty and vain-glorious expectations,
as though they had learnt something high
and mighty. On this point I intend to speak
a little more at length; for perhaps, when
I have done so, things will be clearer with
regard to my present subject.
There is an argument which holds good against
the man ventures to put anything whatever
into writing on questions of this nature;
it has often before been stated by me, and
it seems suitable to the present occasion.
For everything that exists there are three
instruments by which the knowledge of it
is necessarily imparted; fourth, there is
the knowledge itself, and, as fifth, we must
count the thing itself which is known and
truly exists. The first is the name, the,
second the definition, the third. the image,
and the fourth the knowledge. If you wish
to learn what I mean, take these in the case
of one instance, and so understand them in
the case of all. A circle is a thing spoken
of, and its name is that very word which
we have just uttered. The second thing belonging
to it is its definition, made up names and
verbal forms. For that which has the name
"round," "annular," or,
"circle," might be defined as that
which has the distance from its circumference
to its centre everywhere equal. Third, comes
that which is drawn and rubbed out again,
or turned on a lathe and broken up-none of
which things can happen to the circle itself-to
which the other things, mentioned have reference;
for it is something of a different order
from them. Fourth, comes knowledge, intelligence
and right opinion about these things. Under
this one head we must group everything which
has its existence, not in words nor in bodily
shapes, but in souls-from which it is dear
that it is something different from the nature
of the circle itself and from the three things
mentioned before. Of these things intelligence
comes closest in kinship and likeness to
the fifth, and the others are farther distant.
The same applies to straight as well as to
circular form, to colours, to the good, the,
beautiful, the just, to all bodies whether
manufactured or coming into being in the
course of nature, to fire, water, and all
such things, to every living being, to character
in souls, and to all things done and suffered.
For in the case of all these, no one, if
he has not some how or other got hold of
the four things first mentioned, can ever
be completely a partaker of knowledge of
the fifth.
Further, on account of the weakness of language,
these (i. e., the four) attempt to show what
each thing is like, not less than what each
thing is. For this reason no man of intelligence
will venture to express his philosophical
views in language, especially not in language
that is unchangeable, which is true of that
which is set down in written characters.
Again you must learn the point which comes
next. Every circle, of those which are by
the act of man drawn or even turned on a
lathe, is full of that which is opposite
to the fifth thing. For everywhere it has
contact with the straight. But the circle
itself, we say, has nothing in either smaller
or greater, of that which is its opposite.
We say also that the name is not a thing
of permanence for any of them, and that nothing
prevents the things now called round from
being called straight, and the straight things
round; for those who make changes and call
things by opposite names, nothing will be
less permanent (than a name). Again with
regard to the definition, if it is made up
of names and verbal forms, the same remark
holds that there is no sufficiently durable
permanence in it. And there is no end to
the instances of the ambiguity from which
each of the four suffers; but the greatest
of them is that which we mentioned a little
earlier, that, whereas there are two things,
that which has real being, and that which
is only a quality, when the soul is seeking
to know, not the quality, but the essence,
each of the four, presenting to the soul
by word and in act that which it is not seeking
(i. e., the quality), a thing open to refutation
by the senses, being merely the thing presented
to the soul in each particular case whether
by statement or the act of showing, fills,
one may say, every man with puzzlement and
perplexity. Now in subjects in which, by
reason of our defective education, we have
not been accustomed even to search for the
truth, but are satisfied with whatever images
are presented to us, we are not held up to
ridicule by one another, the questioned by
questioners, who can pull to pieces and criticise
the four things. But in subjects where we
try to compel a man to give a clear answer
about the fifth, any one of those who are
capable of overthrowing an antagonist gets
the better of us, and makes the man, who
gives an exposition in speech or writing
or in replies to questions, appear to most
of his hearers to know nothing of the things
on which he is attempting to write or speak;
for they are sometimes not aware that it
is not the mind of the writer or speaker
which is proved to be at fault, but the defective
nature of each of the four instruments.
The process however of dealing with all of
these, as the mind moves up and down to each
in turn, does after much effort give birth
in a well-constituted mind to knowledge of
that which is well constituted. But if a
man is ill-constituted by nature (as the
state of the soul is naturally in the majority
both in its capacity for learning and in
what is called moral character)-or it may
have become so by deterioration-not even
Lynceus could endow such men with the power
of sight. In one word, the man who has no
natural kinship with this matter cannot be
made akin to it by quickness of learning
or memory; for it cannot be engendered at
all in natures which are foreign to it.
Therefore, if men are not by nature kinship
allied to justice and all other things that
are honourable, though they may be good at
learning and remembering other knowledge
of various kinds-or if they have the kinship
but are slow learners and have no memory-none
of all these will ever learn to the full
the truth about virtue and vice. For both
must be learnt together; and together also
must be learnt, by complete and long continued
study, as I said at the beginning, the true
and the false about all that has real being.
After much effort, as names, definitions,
sights, and other data of sense, are brought
into contact and friction one with another,
in the course of scrutiny and kindly testing
by men who proceed by question and answer
without ill will, with a sudden flash there
shines forth understanding about every problem,
and an intelligence whose efforts reach the
furthest limits of human powers. Therefore
every man of worth, when dealing with matters
of worth, will be far from exposing them
to ill feeling and misunderstanding among
men by committing them to writing. In one
word, then, it may be known from this that,
if one sees written treatises composed by
anyone, either the laws of a lawgiver, or
in any other form whatever, these are not
for that man the things of most worth, if
he is a man of worth, but that his treasures
are laid up in the fairest spot that he possesses.
But if these things were worked at by him
as things of real worth, and committed to
writing, then surely, not gods, but men "have
themselves bereft him of his wits."
Anyone who has followed this discourse and
digression will know well that, if Dionysios
or anyone else, great or small, has written
a treatise on the highest matters and the
first principles of things, he has, so I
say, neither heard nor learnt any sound teaching
about the subject of his treatise; otherwise,
he would have had the same reverence for
it, which I have, and would have shrunk from
putting it forth into a world of discord
and uncomeliness. For he wrote it, not as
an aid to memory-since there is no risk of
forgetting it, if a man's soul has once laid
hold of it; for it is expressed in the shortest
of statements-but if he wrote it at all,
it was from a mean craving for honour, either
putting it forth as his own invention, or
to figure as a man possessed of culture,
of which he was not worthy, if his heart
was set on the credit of possessing it. If
then Dionysios gained this culture from the
one lesson which he had from me, we may perhaps
grant him the possession of it, though how
he acquired it-God wot, as the Theban says;
for I gave him the teaching, which I have
described, on that one occasion and never
again.
The next point which requires to be made
clear to anyone who wishes to discover how
things really happened, is the reason why
it came about that I did not continue my
teaching in a second and third lesson and
yet oftener. Does Dionysios, after a single
lesson, believe himself to know the matter,
and has he an adequate knowledge of it, either
as having discovered it for himself or learnt
it before from others, or does he believe
my teaching to be worthless, or, thirdly,
to be beyond his range and too great for
him, and himself to be really unable to live
as one who gives his mind to wisdom and virtue?
For if he thinks it worthless, he will have
to contend with many who say the opposite,
and who would be held in far higher repute
as judges than Dionysios, if on the other
hand, he thinks he has discovered or learnt
the things and that they are worth having
as part of a liberal education, how could
he, unless he is an extraordinary person,
have so recklessly dishonoured the master
who has led the way in these subjects? How
he dishonoured him, I will now state. Up
to this time he had allowed Dion to remain
in possession of his property and to receive
the income from it. But not long after the
foregoing events, as if he had entirely forgotten
his letter to that effect, he no longer allowed
Dion's trustees to send him remittances to
the Peloponnese, on the pretence that the
owner of the property was not Dion but Dion's
son, his own nephew, of whom he himself was
legally the trustee.
These were the actual facts which occurred
up to the point which we have reached. They
had opened my eyes as to the value of Dionysios'
desire for philosophy, and I had every right
to complain, whether I wished to do so or
not. Now by this time it was summer and the
season for sea voyages; therefore I decided
that I must not be vexed with Dionysios rather
than with myself and those who had forced
me to come for the third time into the strait
of Scylla, that once again I might To fell
Charybdis measure back my course, but must
tell Dionysios that it was impossible for
me to remain after this outrage had been
put upon Dion. He tried to soothe me and
begged me to remain, not thinking it desirable
for himself that I should arrive post haste
in person as the bearer of such tidings.
When his entreaties produced no effect, he
promised that he himself would provide me
with transport. For my intention was to embark
on one of the trading ships and sail away,
being indignant and thinking it my duty to
face all dangers, in case I was prevented
from going-since plainly and obviously I
was doing no wrong, but was the party wronged.
Seeing me not at all inclined to stay, he
devised the following scheme to make me stay
during that sading season. On the next day
he came to me and made a plausible proposal:
"Let us put an end," he said, "to
these constant quarrels between you and me
about Dion and his affairs. For your sake
I will do this for Dion. I require him to
take his own property and reside in the Peloponnese,
not as an exile, but on the understanding
that it is open for him to migrate here,
when this step has the joint approval of
himself, me, and you his friends; and this
shall be open to him on the understanding
that he does not plot against me. You and
your friends and Dion's friends here must
be sureties for him in this, and he must
give you security. Let the funds which he
receives be deposited in the Peloponnese
and at Athens, with persons approved by you,
and let Dion enjoy the income from them but
have no power to take them out of deposit
without the approval of you and your friends.
For I have no great confidence in him, that,
if he has this property at his disposal,
he will act justly towards me, for it will
be no small amount; but I have more confidence
in you and your friends. See if this satisfies
you; and on these conditions remain for the
present year, and at the next season you
shall depart taking the property with you.
I am quite sure that Dion will be grateful
to you, if you accomplish so much on his
behalf." When I heard this proposal
I was vexed, but after reflection said I
would let him know my view of it on the following
day.
We agreed to that effect for the moment,
and afterwards when I was by myself I pondered
the matter in much distress. The first reflection
that came up, leading the way in my self-communing,
was this: "Come suppose that Dionysios
intends to do none of the things which he
has mentioned, but that, after my departure,
he writes a plausible letter to Dion, and
orders several of his creatures to write
to the same effect, telling him of the proposal
which he has now made to me, making out that
he was willing to do what he proposed, but
that I refused and completely neglected Dion's
interests.
Further, suppose that he is not willing to
allow my departure, and without giving personal
orders to any of the merchants, makes it
clear, as he easily can, to all that he not
wish me to sail, will anyone consent to take
me as a passenger, when I leave the house:
of Dionysios?" For in addition to my
other troubles, I was lodging at that time
in the garden which surround his house, from
which even the gatekeeper would have refused
to let me go, unless an order had been sent
to him from Dionysios. "Suppose however
that I wait for the year, I shall be able
to write word of these things to Dion, stating
the position in which I am, and the steps
which I am trying to take. And if Dionysios
does any of the things which he says, I shall
have accomplished something that is not altogether
to be sneered at; for Dion's property is,
at a fair estimate, perhaps not less than
a hundred talents. If however the prospect
which I see looming in the future takes the
course which may reasonably be expected,
I know not what I shall do with myself.
Still it is perhaps necessary to go on working
for a year, and to attempt to prove by actual
fact the machinations of Dionysios."
Having come to this decision, on the following
day I said to Dionysios, "I have decided
to remain. But," I continued, "I
must ask that you will not regard me as empowered
to act for Dion, but will along with me write
a letter to him, stating what has now been
decided, and enquire whether this course
satisfies him. If it does not, and if he
has other wishes and demands, he must write
particulars of them as soon as possible,
and you must not as yet take any hasty step
with regard to his interests." This
was what was said and this was the agreement
which was made, almost in these words. Well,
after this the trading-ships took their departure,
and it was no longer possible for me to take
mine, when Dionysios, if you please, addressed
me with the remark that half the property
must be regarded as belonging to Dion and
half to his son. Therefore, he said, he would
sell it, and when it was sold would give
half to me to take away, and would leave
half on the spot for the son.
This course, he said, was the most just.
This proposal was a blow to me, and I thought
it absurd to argue any longer with him; however,
I said that we must wait for Dion's letter,
and then once more write to tell him of this
new proposal. His next step was the brilliant
one of selling the whole of Dion's property,
using his own discretion with regard to the
manner and terms of the sale and of the purchasers.
He spoke not a word to me about the matter
from beginning to end, and I followed his
example and never talked to him again about
Dion's affairs; for I did not think that
I could do any good by doing so. This is
the history so far of my efforts to come
to the rescue of philosophy and of my friends.
After this Dionysios and I went on with our
daily life, I with my eyes turned abroad
like a bird yearning to fly from its perch,
and he always devising some new way of scaring
me back and of keeping a tight hold on Dion's
property. However, we gave out to all Sicily
that we were friends. Dionysios, now deserting
the policy of his father, attempted to lower
the pay of the older members of his body
guard.
The soldiers were furious, and, assembling
in great numbers, declared that they would
not submit. He attempted to use force to
them, shutting the gates of the acropolis;
but they charged straight for the walls,
yelling out an unintelligible and ferocious
war cry. Dionysios took fright and conceded
all their demands and more to the peltasts
then assembled.
A rumour soon spread that Heracleides had
been the cause of all the trouble. Hearing
this, Heracleides kept out of the way. Dionysios
was trying to get hold of him, and being
unable to do so, sent for Theodotes to come
to him in his garden. It happened that I
was walking in the garden at the same time.
I neither know nor did I hear the rest of
what passed between them, but what Theodotes
said to Dionysios in my presence I know and
remember. "Plato," he said, "I
am trying to convince our friend Dionysios
that, if I am able to bring Heracleides before
us to defend himself on the charges which
have been made against him, and if he decides
that Heracleides must no longer live in Sicily,
he should be allowed (this is my point) to
take his son and wife and sail to the Peloponnese
and reside there, taking no action there
against Dionysios and enjoying the income
of his property. I have already sent for
him and will send for him again; and if he
comes in obedience either to my former message
or to this one-well and good.
But I beg and entreat Dionysios that, if
anyone finds Heracleides either in the country
or here, no harm shall come to him, but that
he may retire from the country till Dionysios
comes to some other decision. Do you agree
to this?" he added, addressing Dionysios.
"I agree," he replied, "that
even if he is found at your house, no harm
shall be done to him beyond what has now
been said." On the following day Eurybios
and Theodotes came to me in the evening,
both greatly disturbed. Theodotes said, "Plato,
you were present yesterday during the promises
made by Dionysios to me and to you about
Heracleides?" "Certainly,"
I replied. "Well," he continued,
"at this moment peltasts are scouring
the country seeking to arrest Heracleides;
and he must be somewhere in this neighbourhood.
For Heaven's sake come with us to Dionysios."
So we went and stood in the presence of Dionysios;
and those two stood shedding silent tears,
while I said: "These men are afraid
that you may take strong measures with regard
to Heracleides contrary to what was agreed
yesterday. For it seems that he has returned
and has been seen somewhere about here."
On hearing this he blazed up and turned all
colours, as a man would in a rage.
Theodotes, falling before him in tears, took
his hand and entreated him to do nothing
of the sort. But I broke in and tried to
encourage him, saying: "Be of good cheer,
Theodotes; Dionysios will not have the heart
to take any fresh step contrary to his promises
of yesterday." Fixing his eye on me,
and assuming his most autocratic air he said,
"To you I promised nothing small or
great." "By the gods," I said,
"you did promise that forbearance for
which our friend here now appeals."
With these words I turned away and went out.
After this he continued the hunt for Heracleides,
and Theodotes, sending messages, urged Heracleides
to take flight. Dionysios sent out Teisias
and some peltasts with orders to pursue him.
But Heracleides, as it was said, was just
in time, by a small fraction of a day, in
making his escape into Carthaginian territory.
After this Dionysios thought that his long
cherished scheme not to restore Dion's property
would give him a plausible excuse for hostility
towards me; and first of all he sent me out
of the acropolis, finding a pretext that
the women were obliged to hold a sacrificial
service for ten days in the garden in which
I had my lodging. He therefore ordered me
to stay outside in the house of Archedemos
during this period. While I was there, Theodotes
sent for me and made a great outpouring of
indignation at these occurrences, throwing
the blame on Dionysios. Hearing that I had
been to see Theodotes he regarded this, as
another excuse, sister to the previous one,
for quarrelling with me. Sending a messenger
he enquired if I had really been conferring
with Theodotes on his invitation "Certainly,"
I replied, "Well," continued the
messenger, "he ordered me to tell you
that you are not acting at all well in preferring
always Dion and Dion's friends to him."
And he did not send for me to return to his
house, as though it were now clear that Theodotes
and Heracleides were my friends, and he my
enemy. He also thought that I had no kind
feelings towards him because the property
of Dion was now entirely done for. After
this I resided outside the acropolis among
the mercenaries.
Various people then came to me, among them
those of the ships' crews who came from Athens,
my own fellow citizens, and reported that
I was evil spoken of among the peltasts,
and that some of them were threatening to
make an end of me, if they could get hold
of me.
Accordingly I devised the following plan
for my safety. I sent to Archytes and my
other friends in Taras, telling them the
plight I was in. Finding some excuse for
an embassy from their city, they sent a thirty-oared
galley with Lamiscos, one of themselves,
who came and entreated Dionysios about me,
saying that I wanted to go, and that he should
on no account stand in my way. He consented
and allowed me to go, giving me money for
the journey. But for Dion's property I made
no further request, nor was any of it restored.
I made my way to the Peloponnese to Olympia,
where I found Dion a spectator at the Games,
and told him what had occurred.
Calling Zeus to be his witness, he at once
urged me with my relatives and friends to
make preparations for taking vengeance on
Dionysios-our ground for action being the
breach of faith to a guest-so he put it and
regarded it, while his own was his unjust
expulsion and banishment. Hearing this, I
told him that he might call my friends to
his aid, if they wished to go; "But
for myself," I continued, "you
and others in a way forced me to be the sharer
of Dionysios' table and hearth and his associate
in the acts of religion. He probably believed
the current slanders, that I was plotting
with you against him and his despotic rule;
yet feelings of scruple prevailed with him,
and he spared my life.
Again, I am hardly of the age for being comrade
in arms to anyone; also I stand as a neutral
between you, if ever you desire friendship
and wish to benefit one another; so long
as you aim at injuring one another, call
others to your aid." This I said, because
I was disgusted with my misguided journeyings
to Sicily and my ill-fortune there. But they
disobeyed me and would not listen to my attempts
at reconciliation, and so brought on their
own heads all the evils which have since
taken place. For if Dionysios had restored
to Dion his property or been reconciled with
him on any terms, none of these things would
have happened, so far as human foresight
can foretell. Dion would have easily been
kept in check by my wishes and influence.
But now, rushing upon one another, they have
caused universal disaster.
Dion's aspiration however was the same that
I should say my own or that of any other
right-minded man ought to be. With regard
to his own power, his friends and his country
the ideal of such a man would be to win the
greatest power and honour by rendering the
greatest services. And this end is not attained
if a man gets riches for himself, his supporters
and his country, by forming plots and getting
together conspirators, being all the while
a poor creature, not master of himself, overcome
by the cowardice which fears to fight against
pleasures; nor is it attained if he goes
on to kill the men of substance, whom he
speaks of as the enemy, and to plunder their
possessions, and invites his confederates
and supporters to do the same, with the object
that no one shall say that it is his fault,
if he complains of being poor. The same is
true if anyone renders services of this kind
to the State and receives honours from her
for distributing by decrees the property
of the few among the many-or if, being in
charge the affairs of a great State which
rules over many small ones, he unjustly appropriates
to his own State the possessions of the small
ones. For neither a Dion nor any other man
will, with his eyes open, make his way by
steps like these to a power which will be
fraught with destruction to himself and his
descendants for all time; but he will advance
towards constitutional government and the
framing of the justest and best laws, reaching
these ends without executions and murders
even on the smallest scale.
This course Dion actually followed, thinking
it preferable to suffer iniquitous deeds
rather than to do them; but, while taking
precautions against them, he nevertheless,
when he had reached the climax of victory
over his enemies, took a false step and fell,
a catastrophe not at all surprising. For
a man of piety, temperance and wisdom, when
dealing with the impious, would not be entirely
blind to the character of such men, but it
would perhaps not be surprising if he suffered
the catastrophe that might befall a good
ship's captain, who would not be entirely
unaware of the approach of a storm, but might
be unaware of its extraordinary and startling
violence, and might therefore be overwhelmed
by its force.
The same thing caused Dion's downfall. For
he was not unaware that his assailants were
thoroughly bad men, but he was unaware how
high a pitch of infatuation and of general
wickedness and greed they had reached. This
was the cause of his downfall, which has
involved Sicily in countless sorrows. As
to the steps which should be taken after
the events which I have now related, my advice
has been given pretty fully and may be regarded
as finished; and if you ask my reasons for
recounting the story of my second journey
to Sicily, it seemed to me essential that
an account of it must be given because of
the strange and paradoxical character of
the incidents. If in this present account
of them they appear to anyone more intelligible,
and seem to anyone to show sufficient grounds
in view of the circumstances, the present
statement is adequate and not too lengthy.
-THE END-
|