|
TWO CHEERS FOR COWARDICE
You ask why not three? Only because the word
has a slightly bad odour, which, if you confessed
to it, might give you a reputation for moral
halitosis.
Like all the other vices we call virtues,
courage was invented by a ruling elite in
order to sustain its government. In the days
of hand-to-hand combat it was a decisive
advantage for the masters to avail themselves
of a class or classes of subjects equally
prepared to run sword blades through the
muscle and fat of others and to be run through
themselves. Now that most gentlemen killers
use firearms, target practice is more useful
than bravery. Yet we continue to inoculate
our children with an unreasoning fear of
the instinct to run.
In fact a lion defeated by a rival probably
runs without compunction, his fear untinged
with shame, being more concerned with physical
than with psychological injury. It is unlikely
he smarts from a tattered reputation as we
do.
And yet do we all? Generally it follows from
the warrior-origin of bravery that it was
initially considered a male strength. If
females chose suicide over rape by the enemy,
this was admired by men but not expected.
And to this day, when the suppression of
fear has no practical medieval benefit, courage
is still admired in males by males - specially
by those, like myself, who are quite incapable
of it. Besides, what motivates the bravery
of the brave if not their fear of being reputed
cowards?
Of course there will be times when love of
whatever kind will persuade us to sacrifice
our lives or comfort for another's. This
must not confuse the argument since our motive
would not in that case be courage but simply
love. Turning the tables on these conflicting
mind-sets would be to the advantage of humanity.
So long as there are things worth dying for,
there will be those who will want to make
us die for them. Next time you are challenged,
then, by a rampant male, I recommend that
you take shelter without delay. And comfort
yourself with the knowledge that you are
acting autonomously, not reacting to word-buttons
like semi-conscious robots.
La Rochefoucauld, who had pithy things to
say about all the other seventeenth century
vices, said nothing of cowardice. Himself
a soldier, he appears not to have been able
to shed the vestige of ancient thought that
made it a weakness. We can go beyond him.
If we have the courage to do so.
|