|
CRAZY OLD AUNT
All sorts of benefits are claimed for religion
by believers. Without it, they
say, we would
lose the spiritual dimension,
the comfort
of knowing we shall never die
and the therapeutic
or placebo effect of prayer and
conviction
on health as on our sense of
wellbeing, along
with the deterrent effect it
is conjectured
to have over immoral behaviour.
As Pascal
said, these claims are valid
even if belief
is unfounded.
When in November
2006
scientists met for a ‘Beyond
Belief’ conference
at the Salk Institute in La Jolla,
California,
another, more sentimental assertion
was made
by Nobel laureate and atheist
Stephen Weinberg
on behalf of religion. Although
impatient
to see an end to its tyranny,
he said, ‘I
think we will miss it, like a
crazy old aunt
who tells lies and causes us
all kinds of
trouble, but was beautiful once
and was with
us a long time.’
First, the
spiritual
dimension. What does this mean
apart from
empty rhetoric? Along with the
physical,
we have the metaphysical ‘seen
through a
glass darkly’. It’s beyond digestion
and
defecation and yet with them,
among them.
Transcending desire, it may be
likened to
a sense of being-at-home in the
cosmos. As
T S Eliot put it,
| At the still point of the turning world.
Neither flesh nor fleshless;
Neither from
nor towards; at the still
point, there the
dance is [. . .]¹ |
Certainly
you can find
it in the liturgies of the world’s
religions:
I remember as a child experiencing
a delicate
aural titillation when I heard
our old Anglican
priest muttering: ‘Jesus took
bread, . .
. and blessed it, . . . and brake
it, . .
. and gave it to his disciples,
. . . and
said, Take, eat; . . .this is
my body.’ It
was particularly Canon Merrick’s
long, significant
pauses that – do I dare say it?
- elated
me. For some years this was to
be my Sunday
aunt.
But it’s
by no means
true that the spiritual is exclusively
available
to the church-, mosque-, synagogue-
or temple-goer.
Somewhat later in life in a cane
thicket
by the River Wylye I stood transfixed
by
a sensory experience that was
paradoxically
metaphysical. All it took was
the sound of
the water beside me, the smell
of sedges
and ivy blanketing the elms on
the other
side and the cool body of the
wind nuzzling
my face – no incense and no prayers.
Poetry can
be a source
of spirituality, as can music
and architecture.
It is plain nonsense to say that
religion
is a requirement for experiencing
it: the
spiritual on the one hand and
a belief in
god on the other are not now
and never have
been synonymous. That liturgy
or prayer can
provide similar feelings in no
way means
that I must believe in order
to enjoy them.
And now for
immortality.
Where on earth or in heaven is
the consolation
to be derived from a belief that
your life
can never be quenched? If a two-hour
lecture
has me wriggling in my seat,
how am I going
to face eternity? Why is it,
I wonder, that
people want to go on for ever
and ever? Apart
from its implausibility, the
very idea of
it is enough to cause nightmares.
At seventy-four,
I’m still enjoying life, but
I’ve heard all
the Christmas carols too many
times to wish
to continue hearing them forever.
As for the
placebo effect,
this has to be the strongest
of religion’s
arguments. Not strong enough,
though, to
convince me. Personally I prefer
good diet
and a reasonable lifestyle to
a reliance
on the voodoo of my credulity.
Morality?
We’ve heard
religion² is the last bulwark against immorality.
Believing, we are constantly
told, that Big
Father’s compound eye is forever
watching
us keeps us from doing what comes
most naturally
to us – abominations. The argument
is legless.
What institutions have caused
the most mayhem,
torture, massacres and murders?
– Religious
ones of course. Muslim suicide-bombers,
Catholic
auto da fes, Mormon killings
. . . Let article
2 of the constitution of the
San Jose Chinese
Alliance Church speak for the
intolerance
of all religion:
| Belief in God the Father, Son, and the Holy
Spirit; in the verbal inspiration
of the
Holy Scriptures as originally
given; in the
vicarious atonement of
the Lord Jesus Christ;
in the eternal salvation
of all who believe
in Him and the eternal punishment of all who reject Him.³ |
The
history of
immorality is largely a history
of religion.
Therefore,
I propose
amitacide4 or the killing of our crazy old aunt. We
should do it humanely by means
of strangulation
or throat-cutting, assuring her
that it’s
for her own good as well as for
ours.
|