|
Chapter 12
Tahawism
Tahawism by A. K. M Ayyub Ali, M. A, Ph.
D, Principl Government Rajshahi Madrasah,
Rajshahi (Pakistan)
A
TAHAWI'S LIFE AND WORKS
Abu Ja'far Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Salamah al-Azdi,
al-Hajri, al-Tahawi, was born at Taha, a
village in upper Egypt. His forefathers came
from the Yemen to Egypt and settled there
after it had come under the Muslim rule.
There is a considerable difference of opinion
as to the year of his birth. The years 229/843,
230/ 844, 238/852 and
239/853 are mentioned by different biographers.
Al-Sam'ani asserts that he was born in 229/843
and this is correct. He died in Egypt in
321/933. [1]
Al-Tahawi was mainly interested in Hadith
and Fiqh, and was regarded as one of the
greatest Muhaddithin and fuqaha' of his time.
According to abu Ishaq al-Shirazi, he was
the last leader of Hanafi Fiqh in Egypt.
[2] He began to study Shafi'i Law under his
maternal uncle abu Ibrahim Ismail al-Muzani
(d. 264/878), the most celebrated pupil of
Imam al-Shafi'i, and then leaving his school
he took up the study of Hanafi Law under
al-Shaikh abu Jafar Ahmad b. abi ,`Imran
(d. 285/898), who became the Chief Qadi of
Egypt in 270/883. Different versions are
given by his biographers of his conversion
to Hanafi school, but the most probable reason
seems to be that the system of Imam abu Hanifah
appealed to his critical insight more than
that of Imam Shafi`i.
Al-Tahawi went to Syria in 268/882 for further
studies in Hanafi Law and became a pupil
of Qadi abu Khazim `Abd al-Hamid b. Ja'far,
the then Chief Justice of Syria. [3] He learnt
hadith from a large number of Shaikhs especially
from those who visited Egypt at his time,
and had also many pupils of distinction.
[4] He is a distinguished author of many
important works of which the following may
be mentioned here: 1. Sharh Ma'ani al-Athar,
2. Mushkil al Athar, 3. Ahkam al-Qur'an,
4. Ikhtilaf al-Ulama', 5. al-Nawadir al-Fiqhiyyah,
6. Kitab al-Shurut al-Kabir, 7. al-Shurut
al-Ausat, 8. Sharh al-Jami` al-Saghir, 9.
Sharh al-Jami' al-Kabir, 10. al-Mukhtasar,
11. Manaqib Abi Hanifah, 12. Tarikh al-Kabir,
13. al-Radd `ala Kitab al-Mudallisin, 14.
al-Radd `ala Abi `Ubaid, 15. al-Radd `ala
`Isa b. Abban, 16. Hukm `Aradi Makkah, etc.
His original contribution to Hadith literature,
so far as we can estimate is that he introduced
a new system of collecting legal traditions,
developed a new method of interpreting and
harmonizing the conflicting traditions, and
adopted a new criterion for criticizing them.
His predecessors and contemporaries, the
authors of al-sihah al-Sittah (the Six Canonical
Compilations) collecting traditions according
to their own standards and principles, left
out a large number of genuine traditions.
Al-Tahawi made a strenuous effort to collect
all the genuine legal traditions of the Prophet,
narrated by different authorities on a particular
subject, together with the opinions of the
Companions of the Prophet, their Successors
and the distinguished jurisprudents. He then
scrutinized traditions (ahadith)and showed
by evidence which of them were authentic,
strong, weak, unknown, or such as might be
supposed to have been repealed. Thus, his
collection provided for the scholars an unprecedented
opportunity to judge for themselves the merits
or demerits of a particular tradition. The
criterion for judging the genuineness of
a tradition, according to the Traditionists
in general, was the isnad (chain of the narrators),
and so they paid greater attention to the
scrutiny of the isnad than to the scrutiny
of the text (matn)of a tradition. But al-Tahawi,
while scrutinizing a tradition, took into
consideration the matn as well as the isnad
of the tradition. He also aimed at a harmonizing
interpretation in case of conflicting traditions.
Al-Tahawi, like al-Maturidi, was a follower
of Imam abu Hanifah (d. 150/ 767) in jurisprudence
as well as in theology. He wrote a little
treatise on theology named Bayan al-Sunnah
w-al-Jama'ah, generally known as al`Aqidat
al-Tahawiyyah. [5]In the introduction to
this treatise he says he will give therein
an account of the beliefs of the ahl al-sunnah
w-al-jama'ah according to the views of imam
abu Hanifah, abu Yusuf, and Muhammad al-Shaibani-the
well-known jurisprudents of the community.
So the importance of his creed lies in the
fact that it corroborates the views of Imam
abu Hanifah, the founder of the school, that
have come down to us from different sources.
Al-Tahawi made no attempt to explain the
views of the Imam or to solve the old theological
problems by advancing any new arguments.
His sole aim was to give a summary of the
views of the Imam and to show indirectly
that they were in conformity with the traditional
views of the orthodox school.
The difference between him and al-Maturidi
the two celebrated authorities on the views
of the Imam is quite evident. Al-Maturidi
was a thorough dialectician and his main
endeavour was to find out a philosophical
basis for the views of the leader and to
support these views by scholastic reasoning,
and thereby bring them closer to the views
of the rationalists. Al-Tahawi, as a true
traditionist, did not favour, as will be
seen, any rational discussion or speculative
thinking on the articles of faith, but preferred
to believe and accept them without questioning.
There is no reference in his creed to the
critical examination of the method, sources,
and means of knowledge, or the foundation
on which his theological system is built.
So his system may be termed as dogmatic,
while that of al-Maturidi as critical. The
critical method followed by al-Tahawi in
Hadith is quite lacking in theology. Thus,
though both of them belong to the same school
and uphold faithfully the doctrines of their
master, they differ from each other in temperament,
attitude, and trends of thought.
In order to indicate the characteristics
of the system of al-Tahawi and to make an
estimate of his contributions to theology,
we propose to give in the following pages
an outline of the views of Imam abu Hanifah
along with the views of both al-Tahawi and
al-Maturidi on some of the most important
theological problems that arose in Muslim
theology.
Imam abu Hanifah directed his movement against
the Kharijites, Qadarites, Mu'tazilites,
Shiites, Jabrites, the extreme Murji'ites,
and the Hashwiyyah, the last being a group
of the orthodox people who under the influence
of the converted Jews, Christians, and Magians
fell into gross anthropomorphism, and ascribed
to God all the characteristics of a created
being. [6] He was the first theologian among
the fuqaha' who adopted the principles and
method of reasoning and applied them to a
critical examination of the articles of faith
and the laws of the Shariah. That is why
he and his followers were called by the Traditionists
the People of Reason and Opinion (ashab al-ra'i
w-al-qiyas). This rational spirit and philosophical
attitude were more consistently maintained
by al-Maturidi than by al-Tahawi. Their views
on the nature of faith, attributes of God,
beatific vision, divine decree, and human
freedom may be mentioned here to indicate
the distinctive features of their methods.
B
NATURE OF FAITH
Faith, according to the well-known view of
Imam abu Hanifah, consists of three elements:
knowledge, belief, and confession; knowledge
alone or confession alone is not faith. [7]
Al-Maturidi holds the same view and lays
emphasis on knowledge (ma'rifah)and belief
(tasdiq). But, according to his explanation,
knowledge is the basis of faith and confession
is not in reality an integral part of faith
but only an indication (`alamah)of faith,
a condition for enforcement of Islamic laws
and enjoyment of the rights and privileges
of the Muslim community. So the belief based
on the knowledge of God is the basis of faith.
[8] Al-Tahawi excludes knowledge from his
definition of faith and holds that it consists
in believing by heart and confessing by tongue.
[9]
As regards the relation between faith and
action Imam abu Hanifah maintains that Islam
demands from its followers two things: belief
and practice, and both are essential for
a perfect Muslim. The two are very closely
related like back and belly, but they are
not identical. Practice is distinct from
faith and faith is distinct from practice,
but both are essential elements of Islam.
"Allah has ordained practice for the
faithful, faith for the infidel, and sincerity
for the hypocrite." The term al-din
(religion) includes both faith and action.
[10] Faith, according to him, is a living
conviction of the heart-an absolute and indelible
entity having its own existence independent
of action. From this definition of faith
he arrived at the following conclusions:
(a) Faith is not liable to increase or decrease.
[11] (b) Faith is impaired by doubt. [12]
(c) The faithful are equal in faith but
different in degree of superiority regarding
practice. [13] (d) No Muslim should be declared
devoid of faith on account of any sin, if
he does not declare it to be lawful. One
may be a man of faith with bad behaviour,
but not an infidel. [14] (e) A believer who
dies unrepentant, even though guilty of mortal
sins, will not remain in hell for ever. Allah
may grant him forgiveness or punish him
in accordance with his sins. [15]
Pointing out the differences between himself
and the Murji'ites, Imam abu Hanifah says:
"We do not say that sins do not harm
the faithful, nor do we say that he will
not enter hell, nor do we say that he will
remain there for ever, although he should
be a man of evil practice (fasiq), after
having departed from this world as a man
of faith. And we do not say that our good
actions are accepted and our sins are forgiven,
as the Murji'ites say. But we say that no
one who performs a good action, fulfilling
all its conditions and keeping it free of
all defects, without nullifying it by infidelity,
apostasy, or bad conduct during any part
of his life, shall be neglected by God. God
may punish in hell or grant complete forgiveness
to a person who commits an evil deed (polytheism
and infidelity excluded) and dies without
repenting. [16]
The Kharijites and Mu'tazilites laid so much
emphasis on the doctrine of threats (wa`id)
that they led the believers to despair and
take a depressing view of life; while the
Murji'tes emphasized the doctrine of promise
(wa'd) so much that they quite endangered
the ethical basis of Islam. Imam abu Hanifah
endeavoured to strike a middle course between
these two extremes. Sins, according to him,
are not without consequences; a sinner is
always liable to blame or punishment, but
to drive him out from the fold of Islam,
to declare him an infidel, or to condemn
him to eternal punishment is quite inconsistent
with divine justice. His broad outlook and
tolerant attitude were consistently continued
by al-Maturidi and al-Tahawi. The latter
has summarized the views of his master on
these questions in the following words:
"We do not declare anyone of the people
of qiblah an infidel on account of a sin,
so long as he does not deem it lawful. And
we do not say that sin with faith does no
harm to him who commits it. We entertain
hope for the righteous among the faithful,
but we have no certainty about them, and
we do not certify that they will be in paradise.
We ask forgiveness for their evil actions
and we have fear for them, but we do not
drive them into despair. Sense of security
and despair both turn a man away from religion.
The true way for the people of qiblah lies
midway between these two. A faithful servant
does not go out of the field of faith except
by renouncing what had brought him into it.''
[17]
Al-Tahawi substituted the phrase ahl al-qiblah
for mu'min and Muglim, evidently to avoid
the theological controversies regarding their
identification, and to make the circle of
the believers wider and at the same tune
to give the question a practical bias. He
also avoided the theoretical definition of
a Muslim or mu'min, and instead described
how one could be regarded as such. He says:
"We give those who follow our qiblah
the name Muslim or mu'min, so long as they
acknowledge what the Prophet brought with
him and believe in what he said and what
he narrated." [18]
Knowledge of God and belief in Him may save
those who are guilty of mortal sins from
eternal punishment, and they may entertain
hope of deliverance from hell through divine
mercy and the intercession of the righteous.
"Those who are guilty of grievous sins
will not remain eternally in hell, if they
died as unitarians, even if they were not
repentant. They are left to God's will and
judgment; if He wills He will forgive them
out of His kindness, as He has said: `Surely
Allah will not forgive the setting up of
other gods with Himself; other sins He may
forgive if He pleases; ' [19] and if He wills
He will punish them in hell in proportion
to their sins as demanded by His justice.
Then He will bring them out of it through
His mercy and the intercession of His obedient
people, and finally He will send them to
paradise. This is because Allah is the Lord
of those who know Him well, and He has not
destined them in either world to be like
those who denied Him, went astray from His
guidance, and did not obtain His help and
favour." [20]
It may be noticed here that, although al-Tahawi
did not include knowledge in his definition
of faith, he was fully conscious of the cognitive
aspect of it.
As regards intercession, Imam abu Hanifah
seems to restrict it to the prophets in general
and particularly to Prophet Muhammad, [21]
but al-Tahawi extends this privilege to the
righteous and the pious among the faithful.
As regards the independent character of faith
and equality of the faithful, al-Tahawi says:
"Faith is one and the faithful are equal;
their comparative eminence lies in fear [22]
(of Allah), in righteousness, in disobeying
lust, and in pursuing what is best. All the
believers are friends of the Merciful. The
most honourable among them before God are
those who are the most obedient and the best
followers of the Holy Qur'an." [23]
On the question whether it is obligatory
for a man to know God before the advent of
His messenger, and whether to follow precedence
(taqlid) [24] is allowed in matters of faith,
al-Tahawi does not express his opinion explicitly,
though his master was quite outspoken on
these questions. These questions pertain
to the Mu'tazilites doctrine of promise and
threat (al-wa'd w-al-wa'id), which gave rise
to the discussion of the nature and value
of reason and revelation. They held that
as God has endowed men with reason and they
can easily perceive by proper use of this
faculty that the world has a creator, it
is obligatory on their part to know God even
if the call of the Prophet does not reach
them. But they were divided as to whether
knowledge of God is acquired and a posteriori
(kasabi)or necessary and a priori (daruri).
[25]Imam abu Hanifah agreed with the Mu'tazilites
on the original question and maintained
that "no one can have any excuse for
ignorance about his creator, as he sees the
creation of the heaven and the earth of his
own as well as of others. So even if Allah
should not have sent any messenger to the
people, it was obligatory on them to know
Him by means of their intellect."
C
GOD'S ESSENCE AND ATTRIBUTES
As to the relation between God's essence
and attributes Imam abn Hanifah is stated
to have advised his pupils not to enter into
discussion on this question, but to be content
with ascribing to God the qualities which
He Himself ascribed to Himself. [26] He even
once declined to discuss this problem with
Jahm. [27] In order to avoid the difficulties
involved in affirming attributes, he simply
declared that "they are neither He,
nor other than He" (la huwa wa la ghairuhu).
[28]According to the explanation of al-Maturidi,
this phrase means that the attributes of
God are neither identical with nor separate
from His essence. [29]
Al-Tahawi made no reference to the philosophical
problem of the relation between God and His
essence, nor did he make a clear distinction
between the attributes of essence and those
of actions. But he emphatically asserts the
eternity of the attributes and says: "Allah
has eternally been with His attributes before
He created the world and nothing has been
added to His qualities after the creation,
and as He has been from eternity with His
qualities, He will remain with these to eternity
. . . ." [30]
Expressing his vigorous attitude against
the Antbropomorphists he declared "Whosoever
attributes to Allah any of the human senses
(ma'ani), he becomes an infidel." The
true path lies, he asserts, between tashbih
and ta'til. "He who does not guard against
denial (of attributes) and assimilation slips
and does not attain tanzih. Verily our Lord
the High and Exalted has been attributed
with the attribute of oneness and has been
qualified with the quality of uniqueness.
No one of the creation possesses His qualities.
Allah is most high and praise be to Him.
He is without limits, ends, elements, limbs,
and instruments. The six directions do not
encompass Him as they do the created things."
[31]
It may be inferred from the above statement
and the similar one in the `Aqidah, that
al-Tahawi is against the literal interpretations
of the anthropomorphic expressions of the
Qur'an, such as the face of Allah, His eyes
and hands, etc. But he does not indicate
what these terms signify. Abu Hanifah clearly
states that these terms denote His qualities.
Even then he also is not in favour of giving
any rational interpretation of them, as he
fears that this may lead to the denial of
His qualities. He says: "He has hand,
face, and soul as mentioned in the Qur’an,
and whatever Allah mentioned in the Qur'an
as face, hand, or soul is unquestionably
His quality. It should not be said with the
Qadarites and the Mu'tazilites that by His
hand is meant His power or His bounty, because
this leads to the rejection of certain attributes.
Nay. His hand is His attribute without description."
[32]
The Imam had also adopted the principle of
leaving the judgment to God (tafwid) [33]regarding
the interpretation of the ambiguous verses
of the Qur'an; al-Tahawi stuck to this principle
very consistently. He says: "The foot
of Islam does not stand firm but on the back
of submission and surrender. Whosoever wishes
to attain that knowledge which was forbidden
for him and whose intelligence does not remain
content with submission, his desire certainly
hinders him from access to pure concept of
unity (tauhid), clear knowledge, and correct
faith, and he then wavers between faith and
infidelity, belief and disbelief, confession
and denial as a sceptic, distracted, eccentric,
and fugitive person without being a faithful
believer or a faithless disbeliever."
[34]
The attitude of al-Maturidi on this question
is more rational and liberal than that of
al-Tahawi. According to the former, leaving
judgment to God and passing an interpretative
judgment for oneself are both allowed; and
he is in favour of interpreting them in the
light of explicit verses of the Qur'an. [35]
Throne of Allah - Regarding the Throne of
Allah (‘arsh) as mentioned in the Qur'an,
[36] abu Hanifah maintains that the expression
should not be taken in the literal sense
to mean a particular place. God being the
creator of place cannot be thought of to
be limited by place. He is where He has been
before the creation of place. Abu Muti` al-Balkhi,
one of the disciples of the Imam, asked him,
"What will you say if anyone asks: `Where
is Allah the Exalted?"' He replied:
"He should be told that Allah has been
existing while there was no place before
He created the universe; He has been existing
while there was no `where (aina), no created
being, nor anything else. He is the creator
of everything." [37] Refuting the idea
of the Anthropomorphists that God is in a
particular place, he declared: " We
confess that Allah has seated Himself on
the Throne without any necessity on His part,
and without being fixed on it. If He had
been under any necessity, He would not have
been able to create the world and would have
governed it like the created beings; and
if He should feel any necessity to sit down
and remain seated, where then was He before
the creation of the Throne? God is exalted
and high far above such ideas." [38]
It is evident that, according to abu Hanifah,
God, being eternal and incorporeal, cannot
be conceived as being encompassed by direction
and place. Al-Tahawi, as has been quoted
above, firmly holds this view. "God
is without limits, ends, elements, limbs,
and instruments. The six directions do not
encompass Him as they encompass the created
things." [39] Referring to the Throne
and the Chair, he states: "The Throne
and the Chair are realities as Allah described
them in His honoured Book. But He is not
in need of the Throne nor of what is besides
the Throne. He encompasses everything and
is above everything. [40]
Al-Maturidi went a step further to allow
rational interpretation of those verses,
the apparent sense of which created an impression
of His being in a place. He refuted the view
of those who thought that the Throne was
a particular place and God was on it, in
it, or encompassed by it, as well as the
views of those who thought that He was in
every place. According to him, God being
eternal, infinite, and incorporeal is free
of time and space which imply rest, change,
motion, and movement. Explaining the verses
[41] which were interpreted to prove His
being in a particular place or in every place
by the champions of these views, he asserts
that these verses refer to His creative function,
controlling power, absolute authority, sovereignty,
eternity, and infinitude and indirectly prove
that He is above the limitations of time
and space. [42]
Beatific Vision - This question was discussed
with much fervour by the Companions of the
Prophet. Besides their intense love of God
and an ardent desire to enjoy the happiness
of seeing their Lord in the next world, the
accounts of Ascension (mi'raj), and the prayer
of Moses to have a vision of his Lord as
referred to in the Qur'an, [43] aroused in
them fervent zeal for a discussion of this
topic. It seems quite certain that as a result
of this discussion they arrived at the following
conclusions: (a) God is invisible in this
world; no human being saw Him or will ever
see Him in this world [44] except the Prophet
Muhammad who, according to some of them,
saw Him on the night of mi'raj; (b) God will
be seen by the faithful in paradise. [45]
The eager inquiries of the Companions of
the Prophet whether he saw his Lord [46]
or whether believers will see Him in the
next world [47] and the vehement opposition
of a group of leading Companions, including
`A'ishah, to the common belief that the Prophet
saw his Lord, [48] all clearly indicate that
the Companions were fully conscious of the
difficulties involved in answering these
questions. Their standpoint on this question,
like that on the problem of essence and attributes
was just to believe and refrain from a detailed
discussion of such matters as cannot be comprehended
by human reason. The seeing of God in paradise
was regarded by them as the highest blessing
and happiness for the believers and the summum
bonum of their life. They believed in it
without description
(wasf) or rational explanation. (ta'wil).
The Anthropomorphists, in the subsequent
period, found in this belief a strong basis
for their gross and crude anthropomorphic
conception of God. As God will be seen in
paradise He must have body and form and may
be seen in this world, nay, He may even assume
the form of a beautiful man. [49]
It was Jahm who, in order to oppose tashbih,
laid great emphasis on tanzih and quite consistently
with his idea of abstract God denied for
the first time, according to our present
information, the vision of God in paradise.
[50] The Mu'tazilites adopted this view and
interpreted the beatific vision allegorically.
Imam abu Hanifah upheld the view of the Companions
and discarded both anthropomorphic and allegorical
interpretation of "seeing God."
God will be seen by the faithful in paradise,
he maintains, with their bodily eyes, but
without any idea of place, direction, distance,
comparison, or modality and without any description.
[51] Al-Tahawi maintains the same position
and emphasizes that beatific vision is an
article of faith and it must be accepted
without any doubt, without any rational
interpretation, and without any idea of anthropomorphism.
Any attempt to interpret it by reason will
amount, according to him, to the denial of
this tenet. [52] Al-Maturidi also supported
this orthodox view and opposed tashbih and
ta'wil and showed by elaborate discussion
that the verses of the Qur'an and the traditions
of the Prophet on this question do not allow
any allegorical interpretation. His main
argument, as we have already seen, is that
the conditions of seeing a physical object
in this world should not be applied to seeing
God who has no body and no form and is not
limited by time and space, and that too in
the next world where nature of things and
state of affairs would be quite different
from what prevails here. [53]
Speech of God and the Qur'an - Speech (kalam),
according to abu Hanifah, is an attribute
of God pertaining to His essence and is eternal
like all other divine attributes, and God
speaks by virtue of this eternal speech.
[54] As regards the relation between kalam
of Allah and the Qur'an, he says: "We
confess that the Qur'an is the uncreated
speech of Allah; inspiration or revelation
from Him is neither He nor other than He,
but His quality in reality, written in the
copies, recited by the tongues, and preserved
in the breasts. The ink, the paper, the writing
are created, for they are works of men. The
speech of Allah, on the other hand, is uncreated;
the writings, the letters, the words, and
the verses are signs (dalalat) [55]of the
Qur'an for the sake of human needs. The speech
of Allah is self-existing and its meaning
is understood by means of these symbols.
Whosoever says that the speech of Allah is
created, he is an infidel: His speech, though
recited, written, and retained in the hearts,
is yet never dissociated from Him."
[56]
Abu Hanifah thus refutes the ideas of the
Mu'tazilah who denied the attribute of speech
being identical with divine essence and declared
the Qur'an to have been created, as well
as the ideas of those Mushabbihah and Hashwiyyah
(extreme orthodox) who thought that divine
speech, like human speech, consists of words
and sounds and that the script in which the
Qur'an was written was as eternal as the
Qur'an itself. [57] Kalam of Allah, according
to him, is not identical with His Being,
for this will make His Being complex and
lead to the plurality of Godhead; nor can
it be something other than Himself, for this
will mean that He acquired a new quality
and became what He was not before. This also
implies imperfection and change in the divine
nature; hence absurd. Divine speech, therefore,
must be eternal, and as the Qur'an is universally
accepted to be the speech of Allah, it is
necessarily uncreated.
Al-Tahawi treated this subject with great
caution and condemned controversies about
the Qur'an and practically declined to enter
into a philosophical discussion on the nature
of divine speech. He says: "Verily the
Qur'an-the kalam of Allah-originated (bada`)from
Him as words without description (bila kaifiyyah)and
He sent it down to His Prophet as revelation;
and the faithful believed it to be truly
as such, and they knew for certain that it
was in reality the kalam of Allah, the Exalted,
not created like the speech of the created
beings. So whoever supposes it to be human
speech is an infidel." [58]
The main point of controversy, it may be
mentioned here, between the Jahmiyyah and
Mu'tazilah, on the one hand, and the orthodox,
on the other, was on the nature of the divine
word and its relation to the Qur'an, after
they had all agreed that the Qur'an was the
revealed book of Allah. So al-Tahawi, in
fact, bypassed the main point at issue. He
also made no reference to the relation of
the speeches of created beings or that of
Allah's word addressed to them such as to
the Prophet Moses, as mentioned in the Qur'an,
with the eternal speech-a problem, which
evidently bewildered the minds of Ja'd, Jahm,
and their followers. Abu Hanifah sought to
remove this doubt with reference to the eternal
divine attributes of knowing and creating.
"Allah had indeed been speaking before
He spoke to Moses, as Allah had indeed been
creating from eternity before creating any
creatures. So, when He spoke to Moses, He
spoke to him with His speech which is one
of His eternal attributes." Similarly,
"whatever Allah mentions in the Qur'an,
quoting from Moses and other prophets and
from Pharaoh and Iblis, is the eternal speech
of Allah about them. The speech of Allah
is uncreated, but the speech of Moses and
other created beings is created. The Qur'an
is the speech of Allah and not their speech;
therefore, it is eternal." [59]
Divine Will and Human Freedom - The all-pervading
will of God, His eternal decree (qadar) and
infinite power, on the one hand, and freedom
of the human will and action, on the other,
are equally stressed in the Qur'an. [60]
According to the Qur'an, divine will, decree,
and power are not inconsistent with human
freedom. These problems were discussed by
the Prophet and his Companions. Belief in
qadar was declared by the Prophet as an article
of faith, but at the same time he asserted
that qadar does not deprive a man of his
freedom in his limited sphere.
Thus, according to the Qur'an and the Tradition,
God is the creator of all things including
their nature, and nothing can go against
this nature. He is the creator of the human
soul and its nature and He has created in
it freewill and bestowed upon it the faculty
of knowing, thinking, and distinguishing
and the power of judging, choosing, and selecting.
God, being the omniscient creator, knows
from eternity what His creatures will do
in future-this is the "writing of the
destiny" and "the eternal divine
decree." [61]
That the Prophet laid stress both on qadar
and human freedom and on the possibility
of human action side by side with divine
action, is also evident from his famous saving
on natural religion (din al-fitrah): "Every
child at birth is born in the fitrah, then
it is his parents who make of him a Jew,
a Christian, or a Magian." This is testified
by the Qur'anic verse, "The fitrah of
Allah in which He hath created mankind, there
is no change." [62] The sayings of the
Prophet that divine decree comprises all
human care and precautions for life, that
prayer can change destiny, [63] and that
God has provided remedy for every disease,
[64] and similar other traditions also clearly
indicate that the divine decree is not despotic
or tyrannical in its nature and that it does
not imply any compulsion, nor is it inconsistent
with freedom and responsibility.
The Companions of the Prophet also believed
both in qadar and human freedom and emphatically
denied the idea of compulsion (jabr). Some
prominent Companions explained qadar as
foreknowledge. Abu Musa al-Ash`ari said:
"God decreed as He knew." [65]
`Abd Allah b. `Amr (d. 63/682) used to say:
"The Pen has dried up according to the
knowledge of God." [66] `Ali (d. 40/661)
gave a clear exposition of his view on the
problem and said: "Perhaps you think
that the judgment (qada') is binding and
the decree (qadar) is final. Had it been
so, then reward and punishment would be meaningless
and the promise and threat null and void,
and no reproach then should have come from
Allah against a sinner and no promise for
a righteous person. This is the view of the
brethren of Satan .... Verily Allah has enjoined
discretion, issued prohibitions, and given
warnings. He has not burdened (men) with
compulsion, nor has He sent the prophets
in vain . . . ." [67]
Imam abu Hanifah made, a bold attempt to
harmonize the contradictory views of the
self-determinists and the predeterminists
by explaining the nature of divine power,
will, and decree and enunciating the doctrines
of natural religion (din al-itrah), divine
help, and guidance (taufiq), abandoning (khadhlan)
and acquisition (kasb). God had knowledge
concerning things before they existed from
eternity, and His will, decree, decision,
and writing on the Preserved Tablet are
in accordance with this foreknowledge. So
the eternal decree is of a descriptive nature
and not of a decisive nature. God created
men with natural dispositions (fitrah), endowed
them with intellect, then addressed them
and commanded them through His messenger
to believe and abstain from unbelief. Thereupon
some people deviated from this natural religion,
disavowed truth, and turned to unbelief.
This unbelief is their own act, their own
acquisition, preferred by their free-will,
which God created in them, and is not due
to any compulsion from Him, but due to His
leaving them to themselves. Those who clung
to their nature received divine help and
guidance. "Allah did not compel any
of His creatures to be infidel or faithful,
and He did not create them either as faithful
or infidel, but He created them as individuals,
and faith and unbelief are acts of men ....
All the acts of man, his moving as well as
his resting, are truly his own acquisition,
but Allah creates them and they are caused
by His will, His knowledge, His decision,
and His decree." But while good actions
are according to His desire, pleasure, judgment,
command, and guidance, evil actions are not
in accordance with these. [68]
Al-Maturidi, as we have already noticed,
explained this view quite elaborately and
laid emphasis on the freedom of acquisition
and choice. Al-Tahawi discourages all speculative
thought on the subtle and mysterious question
of predestination (taqdir), because this
may lead one to despair and disobedience.
[69] But he asserts that all human actions
are creations in relation, to God and acquisition
an relation to men, and God is never unjust
to them so as to burden them beyond their
power and capacity. [70]
D
CONCLUSION
Notes:
It will be noticed from what has been said
in the foregoing pages that al-Tahawi did
not introduce any new doctrine or system
in theology, but summarized faithfully and
honestly the views of his master on important
theological questions, in his own language.
So "Tahawism," in fact, does sot
imply a new school of thought in Islamic
theology; it is only another version of Imam
abu Hanifah's theological system. The importance
of al-Tahawiz creed, mainly consists in the
fact that it makes the position of his master
quite clear. Imam abu Hanifah occupied so
important a place in theology and law and
his system exerted so much influence on the
educated mind that the Mu'tazilites, the
Murji'iites, and the orthodox equally claimed
him for themselves. The Mu'tazilites for
this reason even denied his authorship of
any book in theology. [70]
Prominent pupils of Imam abu Hanifah and
his followers mainly engaged themselves in
a close study of the problems of practical
life, and generally it was they who occupied
the posts of judges and legal advisers during
the reign of the `Abbasids and even afterwards.
By virtue of their work they could get little
time for a detailed study of speculative
theology. [72]
Their trends of mind also, it appears, were
not in favour of pure speculation. Their
time, energy, and genius were devoted to
legal studies, and theological speculation
was left for others. Thus, their contribution
to theology is negligible in contrast to
their contributions to law and jurisprudence.
A few of them, like Hammad and Isma'il, the
son and grandson of abu Hanifah, Bishr al-Marisi,
Hafs al-Fard, Bishr b. Walid, Muhammad b.
Shuja', and others who took some interest
in theology, could not quite consistently
explain and expand the views of their leader.
During the reign of al-Mamun and his immediate
successors, the Hanafi judges openly supported
the Mu'tazilites' stand on some of the controversial
questions and co-operated with the rulers
in suppressing the views of the extreme orthodox.
Besides the Mu'tazilites and the Murji'ites,
the followers of Imam abu Hanifah themselves
were divided in interpreting his views. Al-Tahawi,
like al-Maturidi, rendered valuable services
in removing the doubts and confusions and
making the position of the Imam quite clear.
The influence of al-Tahawi on theology can
easily be estimated from the numerous commentaries
written on his creed. In short, al-Tahawi's
credit lies in the fact that he very nicely
and elegantly presented the summaries of
the views of Imam abu Hanifah, the first
founder of the theological school of ahl
alsunnah-summaries for which he must have
relied, besides the latter's works, on other
reliable sources which had already received
recognition from a large number of orthodox
people.
[1] Al-Sam'ani, al-Ansab, Leiden, 1912, fol.
368; ibn Qutlubugha, Taj al-Tarajim,
ed. G. Flugel, Leipzig, 1862, p. 6; ibn al-Nadim,
al-Fihrist, Cairo, 1348/1929, p. 292;
`Abd al-Qadir al-Qarashi, al-Jawahir al-Mud'iyyah,
Hyderabad, 1332/1913, Vol. I,
pp. 102-05; Jalal al-Din, al-Suynti, Husn
al-Muhaddrah, Vol. I, p. 147; ibn Khallikan,
Wafayat al-A'yan, Vol. I, p. 19; al-Dhahabi,
Tadhkirat al-Hufaz, Hyderabad, 1334/1915,
Vol. III, p. 28; `Abd al-Hayy Lakhnawi, al-Fawa'id
al-Bahiyyah, Cairo, 1324/1906, pp. 31-34.
[2] Al-Dhahabi, op. cit., Vol. III, p. 28;
al-Suyuti, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 147.
[3] Cf. authorities cited above.
[4] Muhammad Zahid al-Kauthari, al-Hawi,
Cairo, 1368/ 1948, pp. 6-11; al-Qarashi,
op. cit.; Lisan al-Mizan.
[5] The `Aqidah was published in Halab in
1344/1925. Several commentaries were
written on this creed (cf. Kashf al-Zunun,
Istanbul, II, 1143) one of which named Kitab
Sharh al-Tahawiyyah fi al-`Aqidat al-Salafiyyah
was published at Makkah in 1349/1930, and
was ascribed to Sadr al-Din 'Ali b. Muhammad
al-Adhra'yi.
[6] It was `Abd Allah ibn Saba, a convert
from Judaism, who introduced and propagated
anthropomorphic ideas among the Muslims during
the caliphate of 'Ali. The foreign influence
is traceable at the background of all sorts
of ideas of tashbih, tajsim, and hulul (cf.,
al. Shahrastani, al-Baghdadi). The anthropomorphic
expressions in the Qur'an were never understood
by the Prophet or his Companions in the
strict literal sense.
[7] Abu Hanifah, al-'alim w-al-Muta'allim,
ed. Muhammad Zahid al-Kauthari, pp. 13, 29,
idem, al-Wasiyyah, MS. Cairo, pp. 1, 2; al-Fiqh
al-Akbar, Hyderabad, p. 11; al-Qari, Sharh
Fiqh al-Akbar, pp. 76 et sqq.; Sharh Wasiyyah,
Hyderabad, p. 75; ibn Abd al-Barr al-Intiqa,
Cairo, 1350/1931, p. 168; al-Ash'ari, Maqalat,
Cairo, 1950, Vol. I. p. 202.
[8] Maturidi, Kitab al-Tauhid, MS. Cambridge,
pp. 193 et sqq.; al-Makki, Manaqib Abi Hanifah,
Vol. I, p. 148; Sharh, al-Tahawiyyah, Makkah,
1349/1930, p. 261; al-Taftazani, Sharh al-`Aqa'id
al-Nusafiyyah, Cawnpore, 1347/1928, p. 91.
[9] Al-Tahawi, Bayan al-Sunnah w-al-Jama'ah,
Halab, 1344/ 1925, p. 7.
[10] Al-Fiqh al-Akbar, pp. 10-11; al- Wasiyyah,
MS. Cairo, p. 2; Sharh al- Wasiyyah. p. 78
; al-`Alim w-al Muta'allim, pp. 12 et sqq.;
Risalat Abi Hanifah, ed. al-Kauthari, pp.
35 et sqq.
[11] Al-Fiqh al-Akbar, p. 10; al-Wasiyyah,
p. 2; al-`Alim w-al Muta'allim. pp. 14 et
sqq.; Sharh al- Wasitiyyah, p. 76; al Qari,
Sharh al-Fiqh al-Akbar, pp. 78 et sqq.; abu
al-Muntaha, Sharh al-Fiqh al-Akbar, Hyderabad,
pp. 58 et sqq.
[12] Al-Wasiyyah, p. 2; Sharh al-Wasiyyah,
p. 77 ; al-Fiqh al-Absat ed. al-Kauthari,
pp. 45 et sqq.; Musnad al-Imam al-A'zam,
ed. Muhammad `Abid al-Sindhi, Lucknow,
1316/1898, p. 12.
[13] Al-Fiqh al-Akbar, p. 10; al-`Alim w-al-Muta'allim,
pp. 14, et sqq.; Sharh alWasiyyah, p. 76.
[14] Al-Fiqh al-Akbar, p. 9; al-Fiqh al Absat,
pp. 41 et sqq.; Risalat Abi Hanifah, p. 37;
al-`Alim w-al-Muta'allim, pp. 25 et sqq.;
al-Makki, op. cit., Vol. I, pp. 78et a'qq.;
Musnad al-Imam al A'zam, p. 10.
[15] Mumad al-Imam al-A'zam. pp. 11 et sqq.
[16] Abu Hanifah, al-Fiqh al-Akbar.
[17] Al-Tahawi, al-'Aqidah, p. 7.
[18] Ibid., p. 7 .
[19] Qur'an, iv, 48.
[20] Al-Tahawi, ad-'Aqidah, p. 8.
[21] Al-Fiqh al-Akbar, p. 11.
[22] In the printed text the word is al-Haqiqah
which most probably is al Khashiyyah, cf.
Sharh al-Tahawiayah, p. 261.
[23] Al-`Aqidah, pp. 7-8.
[24] To act or believe on the authority of
others.
[25] Cf. the views of the Mu`tazilites, especially
of `Allaf and al-Nazzam, in alBadghadi's
al-Farq and Usul al-Din, and al-Shahrastani's
Milal. This question was discussed by the
Mu'tazilites, by Ghailan al-Dimashqi (prosecuted
by Hisham b. `Abd al-Malik [d. 125/743]),who
taught that knowledge is of two kinds: natural
or instinctive (fatri)and acquired (muktasab).
Faith, according to him, is the rational
knowledge, not the instinctive knowledge.
(Milal, Vol. I, p. 274; al-Farq, p. 125;
Maqalat, Vol. I, p. 200.)
[26] Al-Biyadi, Isharat, p. 149.
[27] Al-Makki, al-Manaqib, Vol. I, p. 145.
[28] Al-Wasiyyah, p. 4; al-Biyadi, op. cit.,
p. 118.
[29] Al-Isharat, p. 118; Sharh al-Fiqh al-Akbar,
ascribed to al-Maturidi, Hyderabad, p. 19.
[30] al-`Aqidah, p. 4.
[31] Ibid., p. 5.
[32] Al-Fiqh al-Akbar, p. 6.
[33] Leaving the true meaning to the knowledge
of Allah.
[34] Al-`Aqidah, p. 4.
[35] See the chapter on al-Maturidi.
[36] Qur’an, vii, 54; xx, 5; xxx, 75; lix,
17, etc.
[37] Al-Fiqh al-Absat, p. 57.
[38] Al-Wasiyyah, pp. 3-4; Sharh al-Wasiyyah,
p. 81; Isharat, p. 195.
[39] al-`Aqidah, p. 5.
[40] This translation is according to the
text given in the Shark al-Tahaiyyah, p.
213.
[41] Such verses of the Qur'an as vii, 54;
xx, 5; xliii, 84; lix, 17; 1, 16; ivi, 58;
lviii, 7.
[42] Kitab al-Tauhid, pp. 32-37; Ta'wilat,
Surah vii, 54; xx, 5.
[43] Qur'an, vii, 143.
[44] "None among you will ever see his
Lord till he dies" is a saying of the
Prophet, Isharat, p. 65.
[45] Traditions on this point have been narrated
by more or less thirty Companions: Sharh
al-Tahawiyyah, p. 24; Isharat, p. 205.
[48] Ibn Kathir, Tafsir, Vol. III, p. 9;
al-Nawawi, Sharh Muslim, Cairo, 1929, Vol.
III, p. 12.
[47] Al-Nawawi, op. cit., Vol. III, pp. 17
et sqq.
[48] Ibid., pp. 8, et sqq.; Isharat, p. 317;
ibn Kathir, Tafsir, Vol. II, pp. 161 et sqq.;
Vol. IV, pp. 247 et sqq.
[49] Al-Ash'ari, Maqalat, Vol. I, p. 263.
[50] Shahrastani, Milal, Vol. I, p. 137
[51] Al-Fiqh al-Akbar, p. 10; al- Wasiyyah,
p. 7 ; Sharh al-Wasiyyah, p. 97 ; Isharat,
p. 201.
[52] Al-'Aqidah, p. 4.
[53] Cf. the chapter on Maturidism.
[54] Al-Fiqh al-Akbar, p. 5.
[55] In one MS. the word. is alah. (instrument).
[56] Al-W'asiyyah, p. 4; Sharh al-W'asiyyah,
pp. 82-83.
[57] Al-Ash'ari, Al-Irshad, pp. 128-29.
[58] Al-`Aqidah, p. 3; cf. p. 7.
[59] Abu Hanifah, al-Fiqh al-Akbar, pp. 5-6.
[60] Qur'an, vi, 39, 125, 149; xxii, 14;
lxxxv, 16; lxxxvi, 30; liv, 49 and other
verses referring to the divine will and decree.
And the verses: iv, 111; x, 44, 108; xi,
101; xiii, 11.; xvii,
15-17. 84; xviii, 29; xli. 46: x1v. 15, and
many others refer to freedom.
[61] Cf. also verses of the Qur'an, 1, 4,
16.
[62] Bukhari and Muslim, "Kitab al-Qadar";
also Qur'an, xxx, 30.
[63] Tirmidhi, "Kitab al-Qadar."
[64] Mishkat, "Kitab al-Tibb."
[65] Al-Biyadi, op. cit., p. 33. This sentence
has been chosen by Bukhari as the heading
of a section of "Kitab al-Qadar"
in his Sahih.
[66] Wali al-Din, Mishkat al-Masabih, Delhi,
Ch. "Qadar," p. 22.
[67] Al-Murtada al-Zaidi, al-Munyat al-`Amal.
Hyderabad, 1920, p. 7.
[68] Al-Fiqh al-Akbar, pp. 7-8; al-Wasiyyah,
pp. 3, 5-6; Sharh al-Wasiyyah, pp. 79-80,
84-85; cf. al-Makki, op. cit., Vol. II, p.
104; al Bazzazi, al-Manaqib, Vol. II, p.
84; ibn `Abd al-Barr, al-Insab, pp. 164-65.
[69] Al-`Aqidah, p. 5.
[70] Ibid., p. 11.
[71] Al-Bazzazi, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 107;
Tash Kubrazadah, Miftah al Sa’adah, Hyderabad,
1328/1910, Vol. II, p. 29.
[72] Some books on theology were written
by Muhammad al-Shaibani, al-Hasan b. Ziyad
and Zufar b. Hudhail-all pupils of abu Hanifah.
Al-Sam'ani, al-Ansab, Leiden, 1912; ibn Qutlubugha,
Taj al-Tarajim, 1862; ibn al-Nadim, al-Fihrist,
Cairo, 1348/1929; 'Abd al-Qadir al-Qarashi,
al-Jawahir at-Mud'iyyah, Hyderabad, 1332/1913;
Jalal al-Din Suyuti, Husn al-Muhadarah; ibn
Khallikan, Wafayat al-A'yan; al-Dhahabi,
Tadhkirat al-Huffaz, Hyderabad, 1334/1915;
'Abd al-Hayy Lakhnawi, al-Fawa'id al-Bahiyyah,
Cairo, 1324/1906; Muhammad Zahid al-Kauthari,
al-Hawi, Cairo, 1368/1948; Sadr al-Din 'Ali
b. Muhammad al-Adhra'yi, Kitab Sharh al-Tahawiyyah
fi al-'Aqidat al-Salafiyyah. Mecca, 1349/1930;
abu Hanifah, al-'alim w-al-Muta'allim, ed.
Muhammad Zahid al-Kauthari; al-Fiqh al-Akbar,
Hyderabad; al-Qari, Sharh al-Fiqh al-Akbar;
Sharh al-Wafiyyah, Hyderabad; ibn 'Abd al-Barr,
al-Intiqa. Cairo, 1350/1931; al-Ash'ari,
Maqalat, Cairo, 1950; Maturidi, Kitab al-Tauhid,
MS. Cambridge; Sharh al-Tahawiyyah, Mecca,
1349/ 1930; al-Taftazani, Sharh al-'Aqa'id
al-Nasafiyyah, Cawnpore. 1347/1928; al-Tahawi,
Bayan al-Sunnah w-al-Jama'ah, Halab, 1344/1925;
al Biyadi, Isharat; al-Makki, al-Manaqib;
Bukhari and Muslim, "Kitab al-Qadar";
Wali al-Din, Mishkat al-Masabih, Delhi; ibn
Hajar, Lisan al Mizan; Yaqut, Mu'jam; Yafi'i,
Mir'at; Haji Khalifah, Kashf al-Zunun; al-Murtada
al-Zabidi, al-Munyat w-al-'Amal, Hyderabad;
Tash Kubrazadah, Miftah al-Sa'adah, Hyderabad.
|