THE BOOK OF LIGHT LIBER DE LUMINE
by Blessed Raymond Lull Doctor Illuminatus
and Martyr
GOD With the grace and virtue of your
Light
We now begin the Book of Light
FOREWORD
1. Whereas the intellect reproduces
species
by attracting likenesses from physical
and
imaginable things to its coessential
and
natural intelligible part in which
it makes
them intelligible, we now write this
Book
of Light which enables the intellect
to become
fluent in the science of the General
Art,
and this book proceeds according to
the mode
of the General Art whose Principles
and Rules
it adopts. Now this Book is like a
knot tied
in a rope to prompt the memory to recollect
things.
2. By virtue of its subject, this Book
will
enlighten the intellect and stimulate
it
to understand intelligible things artificially
and to discover natural beings with
their
secrets; this Book is meant to be an
Art
of Understanding subsidiary to the
General
Art from which it arises and it deals
above
all with natural things associated
to the
intellect in providing doctrine about
the
light of truth. The subject of this
Book
is that illumination with which all
other
sciences are illuminated.
HOW THIS BOOK IS DIVIDED This Book
has three
Distinctions. The first deals with
the Tree
and the Principles, Rules and Definitions
of the Principles of the General Art.
The
second deals with the Definitions of
light
and the ten Rules. The Third deals
with Questions
about the nine modes of being outside
of
which nothing can exist.
THE TREE
First Distinction The Tree, the Principles,
Rules and Definitions of the Principles
1. In this Book we made one Tree called
the
Tree or Candelabrum of Light, with
nine flowers
as shown, and these flowers are named
after
the nine letters of the Alphabet, namely
B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. K. To know
this Art,
one must know this Alphabet by heart.
B. means Goodness, Difference, Light
and
Whether. C. means Greatness, Concordance,
Light and What. D. means Duration or
Eternity,
Contrariety, Light and Of What. E.
means
Power, Beginning, Light and Why. F.
means
Wisdom, Middle, Light and How much.
G. means
Will, End, Light and What kind. H.
means
Virtue, Majority, Light and When. I.
means
Truth, Equality, Light and Where K.
means
Glory, Minority, Light, How and With
what.
2. This Tree with its flowers is general
for illuminating other sciences with
the
light that the intellect receives from
it
for seeing the other sciences.
3. Here are the Conditions of this
Art's
Candelabrum: if there is some doubtful
issue
that has to do with B, we investigate
it
with whatever B contains, and if this
is
not sufficient, we then apply C to
B and
scrutinize the content of B in conjunction
with the content of C, and if C is
not sufficient,
we go on to D and all the way to K,
combining
letters with each other; this will
necessarily
clarify the issue because this set
of combinations
with B is both implicitly and explicitly
general to all the particular lights
that
can generally be mentioned with reference
to B.
4. Any investigation using the conditions
of the Tree is general to every kind
of light
because the Tree is general, due to
the above
conditions. Nonetheless, before the
Artist
of light can do anything with this
Tree,
he must read the entire Book from beginning
to end and become thoroughly conversant
with
it because the entire Book is implicitly
contained in the Tree. If the doubtful
issue
has more to do with C than with B,
then it
is applied to C and if BC does not
yield
any explicit results, D is then applied
and
so on in sequence all the way to CK;
and
the things said here about B and C
apply
to all other letter combinations.
COMBINING THE FLOWERS IN THE TREE
5. In this part we give a doctrine
that will
enable Artists of this Art to use the
Flowers
of the Tree. first let us deal with
the first
Flower called B. Here we consider the
things
contained in B and if there is any
doubt
about anything contained in B, the
doubtful
issue is treated with the questions
"Whether"
or "What" and with reference
to
the things said about the Definitions
of
Goodness, Difference and Rule B; after
this,
conclusions can be drawn by making
affirmative
or negative statements following the
above
meanings brought to bear on the issue
at
hand without distorting or destroying
the
definitions of Goodness, Difference
and Rule
B.
6. If the doubtful issue relates to
something
contained in Flower C, the Artist will
proceed
in the way described for Flower B,
namely
he will refer to the definitions of
Greatness
and Concordance and to Rule C and assert
whatever appears in the light of the
above
terms brought to bear on the issue,
using
simple or compound definitions as he
sees
fit.
7. If the doubtful issue has to do
with terms
represented by B and C, he will refer
to
the content of Flowers B and C, namely
the
Definitions and Rules in the first
and second
Distinctions, and assert the things
he sees
in the light of the said terms applied
to
the issue; whatever we said about BC
also
applies to the other flowers.
8. Let us use the Flowers to deal with
doubtful
issues, beginning with with Flower
B, for
instance, let us ask: "Can the
Goodness
of light be a reason for good to do
good
without any distinction or motion?"
And it seems that it cannot, as signified
by the definitions of Goodness, Difference
and Rule B.
9. Now if the question has to do with
the
content of C, for instance, if we ask:
"What
is candlelight in terms of Greatness
and
Concordance, and what does it contain
in
itself? And what is it in other things,
and
what does it have in other things?"
Here we apply Rule C and base the answer
on what the first and second Distinctions
say about the definitions of Greatness
and
Concordance.
10. And if the question has to do with
BC,
for instance if we ask: "When
the light
of a candle lights a lamp, does it
cause
good motion as the lamp receives its
influx;
and what motion do they cause and compose?"
Now heating is caused by the heater
and what
is heated, and running by the runner
and
what is run, and an arrow's motion
by the
mover and the movable, and so forth.
And
here the answer is given in accordance
with
the things signified by BC about light
in
the first and second distinctions.
The above
examples of questions made with BC
are valid
for making questions with BD, or CD
and so
forth.
PRINCIPLES
First Distinction First Part Definitions
of the Principles
1. Goodness is the being on account
of which
good does good.
2. Greatness is the being on account
of which
Goodness, Eternity etc. are great.
3. Duration, or Eternity is the being
on
account of which Goodness, Greatness
etc.
are lasting.
4. Power is the being on account of
which
Goodness, Greatness etc. can exist
and act.
5. Wisdom is the being on account of
which
the wise understand.
6. Will is the being on account of
which
Goodness, Greatness etc. are desirable.
7. Virtue is the source of union among
Goodness,
Greatness etc.
8. Truth is that which is true about
Goodness,
Greatness etc.
9. Glory is the bliss in which Goodness,
Greatness etc. repose.
10. Difference is that on account of
which
Goodness, Greatness etc. are clear
reasons
without any confusion.
11. Concordance is that on account
of which
Goodness, Greatness etc. agree in unity
and
plurality.
12. Contrariety is a mutual resistance
of
things with divergent ends.
13. The Beginning is what comes before
everything
else on account of some priority.
14. The Middle is the subject through
which
the End influences the Beginning and
the
Beginning transmits its influence back
to
the End and that naturally participates
in
both.
15. The End is that in which the Beginning
reposes.
16. Majority is the image of the immensity
of Goodness, Greatness etc.
17. Equality is the subject in which
the
End of the Concordance of Goodness,
Greatness
etc. reposes.
18. Minority is a being close to nothingness.
19. Light is the being that illuminates
substances
and dispels the darkness.
To have full knowledge of light, we
will
later define it with the help of these
definitions
rules
First Distinction Second Part The Ten
Rules
or Questions
1. The first Rule inquires into whether
something
is, or not. It has three species, namely
affirmation, doubt and negation. Its
condition
consists in making the affirmations
or negations
that help the most to remember, understand
and love the object: for instance,
let us
ask whether or not the intellect exists:
now it apparently does, because the
affirmation
of its existence can be better remembered,
understood and loved than the denial
of its
existence, and this follows the definitions
of the principles previously given
here.
2. The second Rule deals with Quiddity
or
definition and has four species. The
first
species asks what something is, for
instance,
"What is the intellect?"
This first
species simply considers the essence
by asking
"What is it in itself?" And
the
answer is that the intellect is the
being
of its own essence, called intelligence,
or reason. The second species asks:
"What
does the intellect have in itself co
essentially
and substantially?" And the answer
is
that the intellect has its own innate
intellectivity,
intelligibility and act of understanding.
The third species asks: "What
is the
intellect in other things?" And
the
answer is that in the will, the intellect
is what enables the will to choose
to love
what is truly good and to hate what
is truly
evil. The fourth species asks "What
does the intellect have in other things?"
As in asking "What does the intellect
have in the will?" And the answer
is
that the intellect has action in the
will
through the habit of conscience with
which
it afflicts the will. And this example
using
the intellect can be applied to everything
else.
3. The third Question or Rule inquires
into
Material, and has three species. The
first
species asks about the origin of something,
as for instance "Of what origin
is the
intellect?" And the answer is
that the
intellect consists of its own original
being,
meaning that it is not made or created
from
anything that existed before it, but
simply
created inasmuch as it now is and previously
was not. The second species inquires
into
the constituent parts things are made
of,
as in asking "What does the intellect
consist of?" And the answer is
that
the intellect consists of its own co
essential
principles, namely its own innate intellective,
intelligible and act of understanding;
likewise,
man consists of his own body and soul;
nails
are made of iron, and so with other
similar
things. The third species inquires
into the
ownership of things, like "To
whom does
the intellect belong?" or "To
whom
does the realm belong?" And the
answer
is that the intellect belongs to man
and
the realm belongs to the king. And
this is
how this Rule asks the question "of
what?".
4. The fourth Question asks "Why?"
and has two species: one concerns existence
and the other concerns agency, as in
asking
"Why is there an intellect?"
And
the answer, with regard to existence,
is
that the intellect exists because it
consists
of its own innate intellective, intelligible
and act of understanding, like a whole
that
is what it is on account of its own
constituent
coessential parts. And with regard
to agency,
the intellect exists so that it can
understand
and move purposefully toward its end
which
is to understand God and the truths
of other
things or entities and to have the
habit
of science. With this rule we inquire
into
the "Why and wherefore" of
things.
5. The fifth Question asks about Quantity
and has two species, namely simple
and compound:
for instance, let us ask "What
is the
quantity of intellect in the simplicity
of
its essence?" And the answer is
that
the intellect has the quantity of its
essential
being. As for composition, the answer
is
that the intellect has the quantity
of its
essence and agency, namely its own
innate
intellective, intelligible and act
of understanding
of which it consists. And this Rule
serves
to inquire into the number and measure
of
things.
6. The sixth Question asks about Quality
and has two species, namely proper
and appropriated
quality. Let us ask, for instance,
by the
first species: "What quality does
the
intellect have?" And the answer
is that
the intellect has the quality of its
own
innate intellective, intelligible and
act
of understanding. And if we ask the
same
question by the second species, the
answer
is that the intellect has the qualities
of
the habit or intelligibility that it
appropriates
when it acts within its own intelligibility
whereby it attains other intelligible
beings.
Likewise, let us ask "What is
the quality
of fire in its own quality, namely
heat?"
And the answer is that fire is a being
that
heats, and with the dryness it appropriates
to itself from earth, it is a being
with
the power to dry out air, and so forth.
This
Rule serves to inquire into proper
and appropriated
qualities.
7. The seventh Question asks about
Time and
has as many species as the second,
third,
ninth and tenth Rules as we said in
the chapter
on the Seventh Rule in the Major Art.
But
here we want to give an example of
the Seventh
Rule using only the four species of
the second
Rule, and what we say about them applies
to the remainder. Let us ask: "When
does the intellect exist?" And
by the
first species we answer that the intellect
exists when its being exists. By the
second
species we answer that the intellect
exists
when it has its own innate coessential
parts.
Further, by the third species we answer
that
the intellect exists in other things
when
it acts in them, for instance when
the intellect
is practically engaged in a subject.
The
fourth species asks "When does
the intellect
have something in other things?"
The
answer is that the intellect has something
in other things when it has an understanding
of their likenesses. Any topic can
be dealt
with in the same way as we dealt with
the
intellect. This Rule inquires into
things
as they exist within time and outside
of
time: for instance the intellect is
within
time by the third and fourth species
of C
but it simply exists outside of time
by the
first and second species of the same.
8. The eighth Rule asks about location,
for
instance, let us ask: "Where is
the
intellect?" And this Rule has
as many
species as the second, Third, Ninth
and Tenth
Rules together as was said in the General
Art, but here, for the sake of brevity,
we
want to give an example using only
the four
species of the second Rule. Now the
intellect,
for instance, is in its own coessential
and
natural locus, which is its own being
and
essence, like a man existing in his
humanity.
By the second species the intellect
is in
its own essence and being as its parts
constitute
a whole. By the third species, the
intellect
is in the soul, or in man, or in the
location
where man happens to be. And by the
fourth
species, the intellect is located in
the
virtue or habit with which it has its
habit
of knowledge, and it is also in the
subjects
in which it has practical habits, and
so
forth. This Rule serves to inquire
about
things located in space and about things
that simply exist without occupying
any space;
for instance: the intellect is located
in
space by the third and fourth species
but
does not occupy any location by the
first
and second species.
9. The ninth Question is about mode,
or about
how things exist, and it has four species.
The first asks how a thing exists in
itself.
The second asks how one thing exists
in another.
The third asks about the way parts
are in
the whole and the whole in its parts.
The
fourth asks how a thing transmits its
likenesses
outside itself. With the first species
let
us ask, for instance: "How does
the
intellect exist as a being per se?"
And we answer that the intellect has
a mode
of existing as a being per se inasmuch
as
its own essence is distinct from all
other
essences. The second species asks:
"How
is the intellect in other things and
other
things in it?" And we answer that
the
intellect has a way of existing in
the will
and the will in the intellect inasmuch
as
the intellect and the will together
with
memory constitute the rational soul.
With
the third species, let us ask, for
instance:
"How is the intellect in its parts
and
its parts in it?" And the answer
is
that the intellect has a way of being
in
its parts and its parts in it by the
natural
mode implemented by its own intellective,
intelligible and act of understanding
with
the full participation of these three
correlatives.
With the fourth species, let us ask:
"How
can the intellect transmit its likenesses
outside itself?" And we answer
that
the intellect can transmit its likenesses
outside itself through its habit of
science
with which it understands many things
as
it makes them intelligible in its own
innate
intelligible part. This Rule serves
to ask
about modes according to the way in
which
things exist in themselves or in other
things,
as said above.
10. The Tenth Rule, concerning instrumentality,
asks about what things exist with and
what
they act with, and it has four species
similar
to those in the Rule of modality. For
instance,
let us ask: "With what is the
intellect
a part of the soul?" And we answer
that
the intellect is a part of the soul
with
difference, concordance and power,
and with
all the other principles except contrariety.
With the second species, let us ask:
"With
what does the intellect understand
things
other than itself?" And we answer
that
the intellect understands things by
acquiring
species and combining them together
as it
places them in its own innate intelligible
where it makes them intelligible and
understands
them, like an eye viewing its reflection
in a mirror. With the third species
let us
ask: "With what is the intellect
universal
and particular?" And we answer
that
the intellect is universal inasmuch
as it
has one formal active intellective
power
with which it attains many things within
one universal intelligible that reflects
many intelligible likenesses, like
many images
displayed in one mirror; and it is
particular
when it descends to practical considerations
and understands some specific species
it
has acquired and stored in memory.
With the
fourth species, let us ask: "With
what
does the intellect transmit its likenesses
outside itself?" And we answer
that
the intellect transmits its likeness
outside
itself with its own intellective, intelligible
and act of understanding with which
it produces
intelligible species that can be recalled
by the memory so the will can choose
to love
or hate them. This Rule serves to inquire
about spiritual and physical instruments.
We have dealt with the Questions or
Rules,
and they contain the solutions to the
questions
in the Third distinction and to all
peregrine
questions that can be reduced to the
explicit
terms in the way shown in the second
distinction.
Second Distinction
1. light defined with the principles
Second Distinction Light defined with
the
Principles and Rules
This Distinction has two parts. In
the first
part light is defined with the Principles.
In the second part, the Rules are applied
to light. Now for the first part.
First Part
Light defined with the Principles
1. Light is a good being that naturally
does
good in its own way, and its own Goodness
is its natural reason to do good: now
candlelight
is a good being that naturally does
its own
kind of good by lighting lamps and
lighting
up the air; the Sun illuminates the
atmosphere
to cause daylight, and daylight is
a good
thing because it is instrumental in
destroying
darkness and enabling animals to see;
likewise,
the Moon shines at night to dispel
the darkness
that does evil against good when it
hinders
the sight from seeing.
2. Light is a great being on account
of its
own natural Greatness with which it
produces
great Illumination; candlelight, for
instance,
does its great act by illuminating
lamps
and air. And light has a great act
potentially
existing in its own great, natural
and coessential
Greatness: now if candlelight had enough
fuel, it would grow into a flame so
huge
that it would light up the entire sphere
of air and consume all darkness and
shadow.
3. Light is a being that lasts in its
own
natural Duration with which it causes
the
Goodness, Greatness, Power, Instinct,
Appetite
and Virtue of light to last in air,
so much
so that if light never ran out of matter,
it would last forever without decreasing
in quantity: if candlelight never ran
out
of wick and wax, it could effectively
last
forever.
4. Light is a powerful being by its
very
nature: its innate Power enables it
to maintain
its size and identity and to produce
other
light or lights without decreasing
or going
out, as when candlelight lights a lamp
without
decreasing or vanishing: this is because
its own Goodness, Greatness etc. sustain
its identity, and they cannot do this
if
the light runs out of material, namely
its
wick and its wax, or if the wind blows
it
out, or if it is placed where it cannot
move,
given that light enclosed on all sides
in
a small space cannot move.
5. Light is a being with a natural
Instinct
for doing things proper to its own
nature,
for instance, the light of a candle
has an
Instinct for lighting a lamp by using
all
of its own active mode and the lamp's
entire
passive mode: candlelight cannot light
a
lamp without the entirety of its mode
because
its Instinct cannot perform without
a mode
just as the intellect cannot understand
things
unless it has a mode for understanding
them.
6. Light is a being with its own natural
Appetite for illuminating things and
reproducing
its likenesses, and its Appetite reposes
in the act of illuminating, as when
a candle
lights a lamp and lights up the air
and when
it extends its flame down to another,
extinguished
candle to which it is drawn through
the smoke
by its appetite for lighting things,
as we
know by experience. And likewise, the
intellect
reproduces the likenesses it acquires
to
make them intelligible and exercise
the natural
acts of its own Goodness, Greatness
etc.
in its own understanding of itself.
7. Light is a being that arises with
its
own Virtue from a flame, and as it
is infused
in the air or in a lamp, it optimizes
its
virtuous Goodness and magnifies its
virtuous
Greatness, as when the Virtue of candlelight
lights up air and lights lamps with
its own
Virtue.
8. Light is a being that truly illuminates
air and lamps with itself, from itself,
from
its own Goodness, Greatness etc. and
with
its own Goodness, Greatness etc. while
Truth
makes this a true visual experience;
and
the intellect, likewise, in its own
way,
truly enlightens scholars with the
science
it teaches when its matter and the
scholar's
matter are not impeded by ignorance.
9. Light is a being that delights in
existing
and acting: in existing because it
is what
it is and in acting because it reproduces
itself, like candlelight that has natural
delight in lighting up lamps and space.
And
likewise, the light of intellect delights
in understanding and reproducing its
likenesses
in itself and in the humans who use
it to
learn science; in this way, when the
intellect
is joined to a body, it delights in
attracting
to itself the things it can reach through
the senses and the imagination, and
it delights
in making all this intelligible within
itself
so it can have repose.
10. Light is a being that lights up
colors
and shapes and enables the power of
sight
to see colored objects: as the intellect
attains the truth about things by telling
them apart, likewise, light disposes
distinct
colors and figures in the physically
visible
world, now if there is no light, the
power
of sight cannot perform its act of
seeing.
11. Light is a being that accords visibility
to visible subjects so that the power
of
sight can objectify things and attain
one
light through its concordance with
another
light: now candlelight and lamplight
both
belong to the same genus as they light
up
a house; and so do sunlight and firelight
because the Sun effectively increases
the
heat of fire as the Sun convenes with
fire
in the genus of light and heats bodies
here
below with the heat of fire.
12. Light, or brightness, is the color
of
fire and of the Sun, and darkness cannot
resist this color unless some opaque
body
impedes it; this is because darkness
and
shadow are the colors of earth which
air
receives in its great transparency,
taking
on these colors wherever light is partly
blocked out as when a crystal placed
on green,
blue or red colors receives and takes
on
these colors; now transparency is the
color
of air, fire and air agree in heat
while
light drives out and dispels darkness
and
lends its color to air as we see when
the
Sun shines by day and when candles
illuminate
courtyards at night.
13. Light is the supreme source of
color
because the luminaries of heaven convene
with the light of fire in the same
genus;
now the colors of the luminaries in
heaven
are not in the same genus as the colors
of
earth, water or air.
14. Light is the form used by fire
to move
lightable matter that is lit whenever
form
and matter repose in light.
15. Light is a being that quantifies
things
with its quantity, and it has two kinds
of
quantity, namely continuous and discrete.
It is continuous, for instance, in
the various
sources of light in a house, or in
sunlight
by day and moonlight at night; and
it is
discrete in Saturn and Jupiter etc.
in heaven
and in the Sun by day and in the Moon
at
night, and in a lamp in a room and
in a candle
in a courtyard.
16. Light is a being with the quality
of
showing things and it shows that the
subject
of brightness consists of its innate
bright
parts and this subject lends brightness
to
other subjects that do not shine by
themselves,
as the Sun illuminates the Moon and
candlelight
lights up the air, lamps, etc.
17. Light is a being that relates to
things
by showing them and it shows that sunlight
- or the Sun's body - and fire both
have
substantial, coessential, innate related
parts namely the lucificative, lucificable
and their act of lucification that
give rise
to accidental, peregrine light when
light
illuminates and colors the air.
18. Light is a being that acts by illuminating
air and coloring and brightening it
with
light, and its action overcomes darkness
as was shown above.
19. Light is a passive form whose matter
is the general illuminability in which
peregrine
luminaries receive light. And light
is a
passive form or power when opaque bodies
stop it from dispelling darkness and
from
growing and expanding in quantity and
movement.
20. Light is a habit of air illuminated
by
the Sun in daytime or by a candle in
a room
and thus light is a being situated
in the
subject in which it exists, namely
in the
air's length, breadth and depth, in
the Sun's
and Moon's roundness, in the triangular
shape
of flames, in potentiality in a covered
lamp
and in motion when a stone is struck
with
iron.
21. Light is a being that produces
times
and seasons and participates in motion
more
closely than any other being; now light
cannot
be without motion, and since motion
accords
with time, light participates in sequential
motion more closely than any other
being
does.
22. Light is a being that locates itself
in the air that it lights up and that
locates
air within itself in every place to
which
its radiance extends. And here we see
how
one color is contained in another;
and as
every proper color is inseparable from
its
own subject, we see how bodies in mixture
stand within one another as when elements
mix together in elemented things, or
when
gold and silver are mixed in coins,
or when
substance and accident are mixed in
compounds.
23. Light is a being that habituates
the
things it illuminates: as when candlelight
habituates and clothes illuminated
air by
coloring it with its light, or when
it clothes
a rose with light shining through the
air;
and likewise the intellect habituates
itself
with science in its own innate intelligibility
by acquiring peregrine species habituated
with intelligibility.
24. Light is a subject that exists
in space
within a horizon in which the color
of air
is joined to the color of fire, by
the Sun
in daylight and by the Moon at night,
and
by a candle flame in a room where continuous
and undivided light shines on every
extreme
of every wall as candlelight lights
up the
air and as the air lets light shine
through
its transparency, which cannot happen
unless
the light and the air mix together
to make
one compound that occupies the entire
space
within the horizon both formally and
materially.
25. Light is the end in which the colors
of fire and air repose as does the
power
of sight which cannot see anything
without
light: they repose when their appetite
is
joined to the desired object, as when
the
lover is joined to the beloved and
when the
knower is joined to knowledge, which
comes
about in an act of illumination, when
the
act of loving joins the lover to the
beloved
and the act of knowing joins the knower
to
the knowledge.
26. Light is an image of God's immense
Magnitude,
Goodness, Eternity, Power, Wisdom,
Will,
Virtue, Truth and Glory; now if a lit
candle
had an infinite amount of fuel placed
at
its disposal, it could, with its act
of illuminating,
make its lucificative luminance shine
out
into infinity; but since candlelight
cannot
do this for lack of fuel and space,
this
power of light only exists potentially,
as
does the light of human intellect,
memory
and will. And here we see the Greatness
of
God the creator displaying the outward
signs
of his intrinsic operation and Trinity.
27. Light is a subject in which the
final
concordance between the illuminative
and
illuminated equally reposes in their
act
of illuminating; and the same is understood
about the light of intellect and the
flame
of love in the knower, knowledge and
act
of knowing and in the lover, beloved
and
act of loving; here we see how spiritual
things are signified by corporeal ones.
28. Light is a being whose minority
makes
it exist in proximity to nothingness;
and
it really has minority because it is
deprived
of being when it is deprived of material
and when its opposite, namely darkness
comes
into being. Light also exists in minority
and close to naught when it potentially
exists
in a stone without the presence of
external
agents, like motion and a collision
with
iron or with another stone without
which
it cannot manifest its act.
We used definitions to show how the
general
Principles apply to light, and as we
applied
them to light, they can be applied
to different
beings in different ways.
2. the rules applied to light
*
rule B
*
rules C to K
rule B
Second Distinction Second Part The
Rules
Applied to Light Rule B
In this part we apply the ten Rules
or Questions
to light following the mode used in
the second
part of the first distinction. And
now we
begin with the first Rule.
The first Rule is signified by B. and
deals
with possibility.
1. We ask: "Does the light of
a candle
generate light in a lamp without decreasing
itself? We answer that it does, because
if
candlelight did not generate lamplight
from
itself it would produce it artificially
and
it would not belong to the same genus
as
lamplight, which is impossible; and
candlelight
visibly produces lamplight without
diminishing
itself or decreasing in quantity.
2. Given that candlelight, which is
less
powerful than an Angel, can produce
lamplight,
we ask whether an Angel can generate
another
Angel? And the answer is that it cannot,
because an Angel does not have discontinuous
matter, its matter cannot reproduce,
whereas
candlelight has secondary matter under
prime
matter, and this secondary matter exists
due to the transition of prime matter
into
lamplight by way of generation.
3. We ask whether candlelight moves
on its
own. And the answer is that it does
because
light exists invisibly and potentially
in
the wick and wax and visible light
brings
it into act by generating its species
and
exhausting itself in its upward movement
where it transmutes itself into the
species
of smoke, as we see.
4. We ask whether candlelight illuminates
air within its own essence, and the
answer
is that it does, because fire's essential
illuminating power illuminates air
in fire's
innate illuminable part, and the illuminating
quality does not belong to air itself
but
air appropriates it from fire; now
illumination
could only be air's own quality if
it did
not receive it in and from the illumination
that is proper to fire.
5. We ask whether a lit candle transmutes
the transparency of air into its own
light
while the transparency of air still
remains
what it is, and the answer is that
it does:
now, as imagination internally reproduces
likenesses of outwardly sensible beings
which
still retain their own identity, so
does
candlelight internally transmute the
transparency
of air into brightness while the transparency
retains its identity.
6. We ask whether candlelight is joined
to
the power of sight in viewing colored
things,
and we answer that it is not because
they
do not have the same proper subjects,
although
they work together like an agent with
its
instrument when the power of sight
attains
illuminated and colored objects through
illuminated
air.
7. We ask whether candlelight vegetates
the
light of the lamp it lights, and the
answer
is that it does not, since candlelight
and
lamplight are purely elemented bodies
in
which vegetation cannot be sustained
because
of excessive motion and heat.
8. We ask whether the four elements
exist
in act in candlelight, and the answer
is
that they do, in order to constitute
a full
three dimensional body comprised of
its own
form and matter wherein the elemental
accidents
are sustained.
9. We ask whether lamplight is lit
by candlelight
through necessity or by contingency,
and
the answer is given in two distinct
ways:
now inasmuch as candlelight lights
lamplight,
it does so by natural causation; but
it does
so by contingency inasmuch as the artificer
does not naturally light lamplight
with candlelight
but rather does so through contingency
occasioned
by need.
We solved the above questions with
the first
general Question which is "Whether?"
and we followed its conditions, namely
that
things are to be affirmed or negated
as the
soul remembers, understands and loves
them
more; here we see the general nature
of the
said Rule with its conditions.
rules C to K
Second Distinction Second Part The
Rules
Applied to Light Rules C to K
The second Rule, regarding Quiddity,
signified
by C.
1. What is light? The solution to this
question
is signified by the second Question
or Rule
in the second part of the first distinction.
Light is a being that illuminates things,
for instance, candlelight illuminates
lamplight
and air, and a Doctor enlightens himself
with the habit of science as he enlightens
his students.
2. What does light have in itself coessentially
and naturally? The solution to this
question
is signified by the second Rule in
the first
distinction; now light has in itself
its
own innate constituent parts, namely
the
illuminative, illuminable and their
act of
illuminating: like the light of a candle
whose innate illuminative, in its own
innate
illuminable, illuminates illuminated
air
and produces illuminated lamplight
in its
own illuminable as it brings it from
potentiality
into act by way of generation: likewise,
an Angel acts on things below with
its innate
powers in its own innate matter whereby
it
perceives colors in general without
using
eyes, voices without using ears and
moving
bodies without using touch, etc.
3. What is light in other things? The
solution
to this question is signified by the
second
Rule in the first distinction, now
light
is a disposing agent in air as it enables
the power of sight to attain white
color
that disperses the sight and black
color
that focuses the sight.
4. What does light have in other things?
The solution to this question is signified
by the second Rule in the first distinction,
now light has action in the air it
illuminates
and passion in the power of sight that
uses
it to see color, and light with its
virtue
has action in the power of sight, as
in the
eye which is an illuminated organ joined
to the power of sight that endows it
with
sense and the power to see.
The third Rule, "Of What"
signified
by D.
1. Of what origin is light? The solution
to this question is signified by the
third
Rule in the second part of the first
distinction;
now the Sun's light exists primordially
in
its own right, as does the motion of
the
eighth sphere because at their natural
origin
they are not derived from anything
else.
2. What does light consist of? The
solution
to this question is signified by the
third
Rule in the second part of the first
distinction:
now light consists of its own coessential
lucificative, lucificable and their
act of
lucification, the light of a lamp is
made
from that of a candle and elemented
candlelight
consists of the light of simple fire;
and
the light of air is peregrine because
it
accidentally consists of candlelight;
and
moonlight is made of sunlight; and
Saturn's
motion consists of the motion of the
eighth
sphere at the antipodes that drives
planets
from west to east in our side of the
sky
like water moving a mill wheel by driving
its lower part so that the upper part
moves.
To whom does light belong? The solution
to
this question is signified by the third
species
of the Rule in the first distinction:
now
candlelight belongs to sunlight because
the
heavenly bodies above effectively and
virtually
possess bodies here below; like divine
intellect
possesses human intellect, and the
heat of
fire possesses the heat of air and
that of
hot water.
The Fourth Rule, "Why?" signified
by E
1. Why is there light? The solution
to this
question is signified by the fourth
Rule
in the second part of the first distinction;
now candlelight is necessarily caused
by
its own constituting coessential, substantial
and natural lucificative, lucificable
and
lucification, and the light of a lamp
is
naturally caused by candlelight but
it is
occasioned by contingency when someone
happens
to light a lamp with light from a candle;
and the light in air exists because
its cause
exists, namely candlelight that causes
the
peregrine light in air, outwardly in
its
own necessary lucificable.
2. Why is there candlelight? The solution
to this question is signified by the
fourth
Rule in the second part of the first
distinction;
now candlelight exists for lighting
up the
air and light exists in air to dispel
the
darkness in it so that sighted beings
can
see objects that cannot be seen if
the air
is not lit up.
The Fifth Rule or Rule of Quantity,
signified
by F What is the quantity of candlelight?
The solution to this question is signified
by Rule F in the second part of the
first
distinction; now candlelight in continuous
quantity is one body in one undivided
quantity
through all its discrete quantities
sustained
in its physical parts, namely the lucificative,
lucificable and their act of lucification.
And candlelight has two quantities,
one proper
and one appropriated or peregrine.
Its proper
quantity is its own quantifying quantity
and its peregrine quantity is the quantity
of light in air derived from the said
proper
quantity, and this peregrine quantity
illuminates
stones, horses, etc. Now the quantity
sustained
in the lucificative, lucificable and
their
act of lucification is neither visible
nor
measurable, it is only visible as the
light
of a flame with shape and color and
situation
inasmuch as it is joined to physical
being,
and even so it cannot be sensed by
touch
although its color is visible.
The Sixth Rule, or Rule of Quality,
signified
by G. What is the quality of candlelight?
The solution to this question is signified
by Rule G in the second part of the
first
distinction; now candlelight has two
qualities:
proper and appropriated. The proper
quality
is the light of simple fire whose color
causes
compound candlelight, so the color
of candlelight
is a subalternate quality that rules
the
peregrine color of light in air where
light
causes color in the light reflected
by a
stone or a rose illuminated by light
acting
as an appropriated quality of air.
The Seventh Rule, or the Rule of "When?"
signified by the letter H. When is
there
candlelight? The solution to this question
is signified by Rule H in the second
part
of the first distinction; now candlelight
exists when its own being and number
exist;
it existed potentially in stone and
iron
and in a candle before it was lit.
And candlelight
is in successive becoming when it moves
from
potentiality to act and it is in corruption
when it gradually consumes the wick
and wax
of the candle. It also exists in numeric
alteration when the light that potentially
existed in the wick and wax actually
corrupts
the flame's body by successively depriving
its previous number, without this,
candlelight
could never move from potentiality
to act.
The Eighth Rule, or Rule of "Where?"
signified by I. Where is candlelight?
The
solution to this question is signified
by
Rule I in the second part of the first
distinction;
now candlelight is in its own number
and
it is sustained in its own constituent
lucificative,
lucificable and their lucification;
and it
is in the room where it exists like
the content
in its container; as a body it is in
substance
and accident because physical bodies
are
composed of substance and accidents;
and
it is in air, like the efficient cause
in
its effect; and it is also in motion,
and
so forth.
The Ninth Rule, or Rule of "How?"
signified by K How does candlelight
exist?
The solution to this question is signified
by Rule K in the second part of the
first
distinction; now candlelight has a
way to
be what it is and not to be what it
is not;
and it exists because it contains parts
that
exist within one another, like its
form in
its matter and vice versa; it also
has a
way of existing because of its innate
mobility,
like a flame whose mobility enables
it to
live from wax and wick, because its
nutritional
moisture exists.
The Tenth Rule, or Rule of "With
What?"
signified by K With what does candlelight
exist? The solution to this question
is signified
by Rule K in the second part of the
first
distinction; now candlelight exists
with
the mixture of its constituting elements,
and with the concordance of fire and
air
in heat and of fire and earth in dryness
and with the opposition of earth and
air
in dryness and moisture; and it exists
with
the concordance of air and fire in
heat and
of air and water in moisture and with
the
opposition of water and fire in cold
and
heat. And candlelight exists with the
concordance
of water and air in moisture and of
water
and earth in cold and with the opposition
of air and earth in moisture and dryness.
Further, candlelight exists with the
concordance
of earth and fire in dryness and of
earth
and water in cold, and with the opposition
of fire and water in cold and heat,
which
shows that the motion of candlelight
is derived
from and influenced by the said concordances
and contrarieties existing in one and
the
same subject. Further, candlelight
exists
with its Goodness because it is good,
with
its Greatness because it is great,
with its
Duration with which it lasts and with
its
Power with which it is powerful, and
so forth.
We have dealt with the Rules applied
to light,
and this application is a general locus
from
which you can fully extract solutions
to
any questions that can be asked about
light.
Third Distinction: Questions
Third Distinction Questions
This distinction deals with peregrine
questions
and their solutions are referred to
the first
distinction where they are implicit
and to
the second distinction where they are
more
explicitly signified. Now the questions
are
divided into nine parts, namely into
nine
beings which are the following: God,
Angel,
Heaven, Soul, Imagination, Sense, Vegetation,
Elements, Artifice. There are actually
no
more than these nine because whatever
exists
or can exist must be included in its
way
within the nine above terms.
We have five loci to refer to for solving
questions, namely: the Tree, the first
and
second parts of the first distinction
and
the first and second parts of the second
distinction. Now let us deal with the
first
part of the third distinction.
God
Third Distinction First Part Questions
about
God
1. Question: Is there good, infinite
and
eternal production within God? The
solution
to this question is signified by the
definitions
of Goodness, Greatness and Eternity
and by
BC of the Tree, especially Rules B
and C.
2. Question: Do the divine dignities
or reasons
have their own equal acts in God's
essence?
Solution: apply B, C, G, and I to the
loci
in the first and second distinctions.
3. Question: Is God the being of his
own
essence? Solution: go to the first
species
of Rule C in the first and second distinctions.
4. Question: What does God have naturally
and coessentially within Himself? Solution:
Go to the second species of Rule C
in the
first and second distinctions.
5. Question: Does God represent his
intrinsic,
coessential and natural operation to
the
human intellect in this life? Solution:
Go
to the third species of Rule C.
6. Question: What does God have in
his effect?
Solution: Go to the fourth species
of Rule
C in the second distinction.
7. Question: Can God produce something
else
from Himself without diminishing Himself?
Solution: Go to the first Rule in the
second
distinction, the first paragraph on
B.
8. Question: Must there necessarily
be some
differentiation within the Godhead?
Solution:
Go to the second distinction, the ninth
paragraph
of rule B and to the second species
of Rule
C in the first and second distinctions.
9. Question: Is there nature in God?
Solution:
Go to the definitions of Goodness,
Greatness
and Power and to the second species
of Rules
C and D.
10. Question: What does God consist
of? Solution:
Go to the second species of Rule D
in the
first and second distinctions.
11. Question: Is God a necessary being?
Solution:
Go to Rule E.
12. Question: Is God as great in his
intrinsic
act as in his existence? Solution:
Go to
Rules E and G and to Flowers B, C and
G in
the Tree.
13. Question: Is there any properly
numeral
quantity in God? Solution: Go to Flowers
C, D and F and then to the Rules and
definitions
signified by them in the first and
second
distinctions.
14. Question: Are there any properties
in
God? Solution: Go to B, C, D, and G
and then
to the things they signify in the first
and
second distinctions.
15. Question: Where is God? Solution:
Go
to Rule I in the first and second distinctions
and to the second species of Rule C.
16. Question: How does God exist and
how
does He act within Himself? Solution:
Go
to the second species of Rule C and
to the
ninth Rule K. However, note that God
in Himself
is not divided into parts, but has
infinite
and eternal properties as indicated
by Rules
B and C.
17. Question: With what does God exist
and
with what does He act within Himself?
Solution:
Go to the definitions of Goodness,
Greatness
etc. and to Rule K in the divine mode
and
go to the second species of Rule C.
We have dealt with the questions about
God
and shown how to find solutions to
questions
in the above loci, and all other questions
about God can be solved in the same
way..
THANKS BE TO GOD |