Critique of Religious Faith
8/04/2011
Fred Leavitt
|
|
Prof. Fred Leavitt teaches at California
State University, East Bay and has taught
as a visiting professor at universities in
eight different countries. He has written
books and articles in psychopharmacology,
research methodology, philosophy, and medical
practices. Prof Leavitt has given frequent
talks to physicians for their continuing
medical education credits.
This recent educative piece by the respected
academic is exaustively researched, incisively
written and pungently pithy and to the point.
From the initial description of infantile
religious imprintation, to the magisterially
dismissive summation of religious belief
as:"Faith is not merely belief in the
absence of evidence--it's belief despite
evidence" Prof. Leavitt's eloquent critique
speaks for millions and is a delight and
a breath of fresh air to read. Jud Evans.
Editor.
|
The Origins of Religious Faith
Within days after birth, helpless infants
recognize the caretakers who provide food,
warmth, and shelter. Babies and young children
not only recognize, they also trust their
parents. When told about a fairy who exchanges
money for teeth and a fat man laden with
presents who slides down chimneys, children
have faith in the stories. They accept the
version of reality foisted on them by their
parents, peers, community leaders, and humble
servants of the church.
We often trust authorities, and we should.
I believe that the earth is round and smaller
than the twinkly things that light up the
night sky, not because I deduced those facts
on my own, but because others told me so.
Authorities have also convinced me that enormous
reptiles once roamed the earth and Saudi
Arabia gets hot. They have earned the right
to their authority: Astronomers spend years
learning how to interpret stellar data, archeologists
do the same for fossils, and both types of
scientists test their hypotheses with observations
and controlled experiments.
But the public and private beliefs of many
authority figures do not always correspond,
as when prominent athletes hawk products
on television or politicians open their mouths.
With respect to religion, although theologians
may be experts in interpreting a bible, they
don't know any more than laypeople whether
any particular bible tells the truth or whether
there is a supreme being or life continues
after death. How does one become an expert
on life after death?
If the evidence for religious beliefs were
trustworthy, preferences would be independent
of time and place of upbringing. They are
not. More atheists live in Azerbaijan than
Atlanta, more Baptists in Biloxi than Bombay,
more Catholics in Cincinnati than Calcutta,
more Jews in Jerusalem than Jakarta, and
more Moslems in Malaysia than Monaco. The
demographic details reflect the obvious fact
that people living within a broad general
region are exposed to the same newspapers,
TV shows, films, and books. For the same
reason, football fans from Cincinnati are
more likely than Chicagoans to root for the
Bengals whereas Chicago residents prefer
the Bears. (But Bengal fans do not claim
that their team's playbook is the only true
one or that Chicago fans worship false idols.)
Do you believe that Jesus turned water into
wine, walked on water, and rose from the
dead? Did God turn Lot's wife into a pillar
of salt? Do you stick pins into dolls of
your enemy? Are you convinced that pairs
of each of the more than two million animal
species assembled and sailed peacefully in
an ark? Will you be reincarnated? If you
are a man who dies a martyr, will 72 virgins
welcome you to paradise?
If you answered "No" to at least
one of the questions-- and I'd like to meet
anyone who gives "Yeses" across
the board-- how do you account for the "Yeses?"
Are the "yes" respondents lying?
Ignorant savages? Psychotic? Stupid? Delusional?
Undoubtedly, each category is represented,
but there must be a more inclusive explanation.
The belief that life has meaning makes it
worth living-- even if life has no meaning.
Whether or not the universe is ruled by a
loving God, faith in a higher power helps
millions get through each day. In the event
of tragedy, faith consoles. To envisage a
recently deceased loved one in a better place,
to anticipate a heavenly reunion someday,
is analgesic.
Religious Faith is Beneficial
Church attendance is a social occasion. People
meet future friends, spouses, and business
associates at church socials. By accepting
the traditional beliefs of their community,
they become part of a team. Congregations
form powerful voting blocs. Faith enables
people to achieve feats that would otherwise
be beyond their capabilities. Imagine having
to walk across a long, narrow plank suspended
between the rooftops of two tall buildings,
with no net down below. The terrifying task
would likely end in death. Yet walking would
be effortless if the plank lay on the ground.
A hypnotist or evangelist who convinced you
that the plank was on the ground might save
your life. Your unjustified faith might save
your life.
Faith benefits at both ends of the happiness
spectrum. It comforts and consoles, giving
hope to people in foxholes, or starving,
or enslaved'"if not for this world,
then for the next. Bishop George Berkeley
wrote, "I can easily overlook any present
momentary sorrow when I reflect that it is
in my power to be happy a thousand years
hence." At the other end, successful
people, cognizant of the fact that fame,
power, wealth, and health are subject to
fortune's whims, may believe that God will
be touched by their thankful prayers and
shield them from any downturns.
"This human world of ours would be inconceivable
without the practical existence of a religious
belief." Adolf Hitler
Philosopher Blaise Pascal argued that faith
makes practical sense. He wrote that, if
God exists, believers will be rewarded while
disbelievers suffer eternal damnation. If
He doesn't exist, belief and disbelief won't
matter. In other words, faith separates children
of God from benighted fools whose loving
creator, if He exists, damns them to burn
eternally in Hell.
But Pascal didn't consider all the alternatives.
God may not be all-loving. She may be indifferent
to humans, possibly even malevolent. That
is beside the point: whether or not Pascal's
wager is a smart one, having a reason for
a belief does not make the belief true. Beneficial
illusions are still illusions. Furthermore,
given the hundreds of different religions,
a small minority at most could possibly hold
accurate beliefs. Most Americans accept that
the Red Sea parted for Moses and angels sing
in heaven, but they scoff at the idea of
Zeus hurling thunderbolts or dances bringing
rain. Would Pascal advise them to bet across
the board?
Under Pascal's conditions, there is no penalty
for incorrect beliefs. But consider a modification
in which, if a loving God rules the universe,
believers and nonbelievers fare equally well.
But if Satan is top dog, nonbelievers are
unaffected while believers suffer an excruciatingly
painful death. Would you believe? The question
is not just irrelevant, it's silly. If beliefs
could be shaped that easily, the human condition
would be one of unalloyed happiness. We'd
have no concerns about war, pestilence, famine,
or global warming, and we could eliminate
the concept of God. He is, after all, only
a middleman who rewards loyal subjects with
eternal happiness. Why not just believe that
eternal happiness is our birthright.
Anthropologist Marvin Harris also claimed
that religious faith makes practical sense.
Harris asserted that, despite appearances
to the contrary, no religions decrease the
potential for the well-being of their followers.
People often require a manufactured "divine
intervention" to get them to act in
their best interests. For example, the Hindu
religion bans killing cows, which is the
only reason why cows are not routinely killed
for their meat. The ban benefits Hindus,
because cows are much more valuable to them
for plowing fields and providing milk. Harris
wrote, "Westerners think that Indians
would rather starve than eat their cows.
What they don't understand is that they will
starve if they do eat their cows." For
similar reasons, Jews and Muslims don't eat
pork. Although a common explanation is that
pigs are dirty--impure, unclean, and therefore
not to be eaten--a more realistic one is
that pigs are not adapted for arid habitats.
Lacking sweat glands, they need external
sources of moisture to control their body
temperature, which is why they wallow in
mud. They would be prohibitively expensive
to maintain in the hot Middle East.
Wealthy people might have been tempted to
raise a few pigs as luxury food for special
occasions. In the long run, that would have
endangered precious resources. So it was
better to have people believe that God decreed,
"Thou shalt, under no circumstance,
raise pigs."
But Maybe Not So Beneficial
Benjamin Franklin stated that "religion
will be a powerful regulator of our actions,
give us peace and tranquility within our
minds, and render us benevolent, useful and
beneficial to others." Dostoyevsky wrote,
"If God does not exist, then everything
is permissible." But a study by Gregory
Paul contradicts the belief that religion
provides the moral foundations for a healthy
society. In fact, religion may contribute
to social problems.
Paul used interview data collected by the
International Social Survey Program over
the course of several years on 23,000 people
in 38 nations. The data analyzed rates of
religious belief and practice. Among the
developed democracies, absolute belief in
God, attendance of religious services, Bible
literalism, prayer rates, and acceptance
of evolution varied greatly.
Paul also used data from the UN Development
Programme to assess such issues as societal
health, homicide rates, youth suicide, sexually
transmitted disease, teen pregnancy, and
rates of abortion. He concluded that populations
of the more secular democracies, in which
the theory of evolution is widely accepted,
feature low rates of lethal crime, juvenile-adult
mortality, sex related dysfunction, and abortion.
Rates of belief in and worship of a creator
correlate positively with rates of homicide,
juvenile and early adult mortality, STD infection
rates, teen pregnancy, and abortion. The
most theistic prosperous democracy, the U.
S., is by almost all measures the most dysfunctional
of the developed democracies.
Within the U. S., strong religious beliefs
and acceptance of evolution are similarly
positively correlated with rates of societal
dysfunction. The strongly theistic, anti-evolution
south and mid-west have markedly worse homicide,
mortality, STD, youth pregnancy, marital,
and related problems than the northeast where
societal conditions, secularization, and
acceptance of evolution approach European
norms.
In recent years, many U. S. senators and
representatives have received high approval
ratings from influential Christian right
advocacy groups and flunking grades from
the League of Conservation Voters. One reason
is that leaders of the Christian right, and
millions of their followers, believe the
words of a history text that, according to
the Providence Foundation, has sold more
than 100,000 copies since its first printing
in 1989. The book, America's Providential
History, is used in home schooling, private
and public schools, religious schools, political
seminars, discussion groups, colleges, and
seminaries. The authors wrote: "The
secular or socialist has a limited resource
mentality and views the world as a pie (there
is only so much) that needs to be cut up
so that everyone can get a piece. In contrast,
the Christian knows that the potential in
God is unlimited and that there is no shortage
of resources in God's earth. The resources
are waiting to be tapped."
Many in the Christian right believe that
the return of the son of God is imminent.
Upon His return, the righteous will enter
heaven and sinners will be condemned to eternal
hellfire. So, a second reason for being unconcerned
about destruction of the environment--in
fact, being pleased--is that it signals the
coming Apocalypse.
Faith (of Others) is Definitely Beneficial
to Some
The founder of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard,
once said "Writing for a penny a word
is ridiculous. If a man really wanted to
make a million dollars, the best way would
be to start his own religion." Most
religious leaders are charismatic figures
whose opulent lifestyles depend on encouraging
others to keep the faith.
Religion has been very good to televangelist
Pat Robertson. Some estimates put his net
worth at 140 million. Trinity Broadcasting Network founder Paul Crouch and his wife earned
close to one million dollars per year in
salary alone. They also owned very expensive
property. The Reverend Bill Graham is a highly
successful businessman. The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association
became an incorporated company in 1950 and
spawned numerous subsidiaries over the years,
including the Billy Graham Evangelistic Film Ministry,
the Grason Company (a publishing company for books, records,
and music), World Wide Publications, and the Billy Graham Center (a museum dedicated to the study of evangelism).
The Rev. Dr. Sun Myung Moon parlayed religion
into a multibillion dollar business. In 1994,
evangelist Jerry Falwell accepted $3.5 million
from Moon. Rick Warren's The Purpose-Driven Life has sold over fourteen million copies since
October 2002, making it the bestselling hardback
nonfiction book in history.
Following is a very incomplete list of other
people who have convinced the multitudes
to part with large sums of money: Joel Osteen,
Juanita Bynum, Rodney Howard- Browne, T.
D. Jakes, Benny Hinn, Paula and Randy White,
Mike Murdock, Rev. James Eugene Ewing, and
John Hagee. Statement from the Economic Report of the
Holy See for 2000: For the eighth consecutive year, the operating
statement for fiscal year 2000 for the Holy
See closes with a net gain of 17.720 billion,
equal to $8,516,000 US at the exchange rate
at the end of the year of 2,080.89 lire per
dollar. The total expenses were 404.378 billion
and the total income was 422.098 billion.
Compared with the previous fiscal year, the
income was more substantial, having increased
by 64 billion.
"If God existed as an all-powerful being,
He would not need the money that faithful
believers donate to their churches."
Donald Morgan
Televangelists, rabbis, priests, and mullahs
are not the only ones who benefit from the
faith of others. Karl Marx called religion
the opiate of the masses. Opium reduces both
physical and emotional pain. Opium induces
pleasant dreams. The rich and powerful can
rest more comfortably when the downtrodden
dream that acceptance of their terrible existence
is a small price to pay for eternal salvation.
Religious Leaders Have God's Cell Phone Number
In the 1980s, Pat Robertson claimed that
God told him, "I want you to run for
president of the United States." In
2004, God told him that President Bush would
easily win re-election against John Kerry.
In Robertson's words, "I'm hearing from
the Lord it's going to be like a blowout
election in 2004." God also told Robertson
to buy a television station for his ministry,
and not just the cheapest transmitter available.
God said, "Pat, I want you to have an
RCA transmitter." In 1987, evangelist
Oral Roberts announced to his television
audience that God had told him that he must
raise $8 million within the next 12 months
or he would die. (His flock raised the money.)
In 2003, Jerry Falwell explained that God
is a shrewd strategist. Falwell said that
He arranged for President Clinton to be re-elected
so that Americans would beg for somebody
else. Falwell also said, "AIDS is not
just God's punishment for homosexuals; it
is God's punishment for the society that
tolerates homosexuals."
But, strange as it may seem, God miscalculated.
He underestimated America's depth of perversity
and had to administer an additional dollop
of tough love. So, in the words of televangelist
John Hagee (NPR interview in 2006): "All
hurricanes are acts of God, because God controls
the heavens. I believe that New Orleans had
a level of sin that was offensive to God,
and they were recipients of the judgment
of God for that." And, "Hurricane
Katrina was, in fact, the judgment of God
against the city of New Orleans."
Barbara Rose's Internet site (http://borntoinspire.
com/) offers "GOD Guided Heaven Sessions."
Rose, a paragon of humility, notes that "It
is not 'just me' that does this work, but
God who works through me." It's curious
to think that god's powers are so limited
that he can make his will known only through
others'"even more curious that he picks
people like Robertson, Roberts, and Falwell.
Couldn't he write the Ten Commandments in
the sky for everyone to see? Or whisper in
everybody's ear? Maybe we just haven't appreciated
his great sense of irony.
Maybe They Had a Bad Connection
Every profession has its share of hypocrites
and criminals, but religious leaders'"the
ones who instill moral codes in their followers'"should
not compete with pornographers and snake
oil salesmen for the moral vacuum award.
Below is a very incomplete list of religious
leaders who made headlines during the past
25 years.
You shall not murder. Sixth Commandment
Shoko Asahara claimed to be a reincarnation
of the Hindu god Shiva, and promised to lead
his followers to salvation when Armageddon
arrived. His cult, Aum Shinrikyo, released
deadly sarin gas onto the Tokyo underground
in 1995. Seven people were killed. Meir Kahane
was an American Jewish Orthodox rabbi. He
was imprisoned for plotting the bombing of
a mosque. Swami Premananda set up an ashram
in Sri Lanka that became noted for taking
in orphans. He was convicted on several charges
of raping girls and also for murder. He is
currently serving a double life sentence.
You have heard that it was said, 'Love your
neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell
you: Love your enemies and pray for those
who persecute you. (Matthew 5:43)
Fred Phelps, the leader of Westboro Baptist
Church in Topeka, Kansas, has organized demonstrations
in at least 22 states at funerals of soldiers
killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. His supporters
carry placards reading "Thank God for
Dead Soldiers," and they shout epithets
at grieving parents. Phelps asserts that
God punished the soldiers because the U.
S. is tolerant of homosexuality. In his words,
"God hates fags." Jerry Falwell
called James Bakker, a former Assemblies of God minister and host of a popular evangelical
Christian television program, a liar, an
embezzler, a sexual deviant, and "the
greatest scab and cancer on the face of Christianity
in 2,000 years of church history."
You shall not commit adultery. (Seventh Commandment).
According to many religious leaders, there
are prohibitions of many other forms of sex.
Bakker's staff members paid $265,000 to his
former secretary to keep secret her allegation
that he had raped her, In 1987, following
threats that the payoff would be revealed,
Bakker resigned from his position. Warren
Jeffs, the former President of Fundamentalist
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints,
was charged with conspiracy to commit sex
crimes. He was arrested after being on the
FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives list for a
little over 16 weeks. In 1986 Jimmy Swaggart
helped defrock fellow Assemblies of God minister
Marvin Gorman for conducting an extramarital
affair. The next year, a private detective
hired by Gorman took photos of Jimmy Swaggart
with a prostitute. Swaggart told the Assemblies
of God leadership that he suffered a lifelong
addiction to pornography. In 2006, Pastor
Ted Haggard of New Life Church in Colorado
Springs, Colorado, admitted to some charges
levied against him by his former male escort.
The escort claimed that Haggard paid him
for sex over a 3 year period and used methamphetamine
with him. Haggard at first claimed he did
not know his accuser. He later admitted that
the escort had given him a massage but denied
that it was sexual. He also admitted buying
methamphetamine but denied using it. He was
fired by the church for "sexually immoral
conduct."
Israel's Ashkenazi chief rabbi, Yona Metzger,
has been repeatedly accused of breaking the
law. In 2003, an Israeli newspaper published
a report in which four young men accused
Metzger of groping them. He has been accused
of sexually harassing women as well. Paul
Crouch is the co-founder, chairman, and president
of the Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN), the world's largest Christian television
network. In 2004, the Los Angeles Times reported that Crouch in 1998 paid a former
employee a $425,000 settlement to end a sexual
harassment lawsuit alleging that the man
was forced into a homosexual encounter with
Crouch under threats of job termination.
TBN officials acknowledged the settlement
while claiming that it was made in order
to avoid an expensive lawsuit. During the
last decade, thousands of pedophile Roman
Catholic priests have been exposed in the
U. S., Ireland, Canada, Poland, Australia,
Britain, France, Mexico and Austria. In some
cases the crimes were covered up by Church
authorities and the perpetrators moved to
another location, sometimes repeatedly. As
a result, some of the pedophile priests had
continued access to children whose lives
they ruined. And not just young boys.
The Magdalene institutions, originally established
in the nineteenth century by the Sisters
of Mercy as spiritual refuges for prostitutes
and other women penitents, took in as many
as 30,000 women until they closed in 1996.
The institutions held girls and women against
their will for "offenses" such
as flirting or having been raped. Inmates
were often beaten, stripped naked, mocked
by sadistic nuns, and abused in other ways.
And not just the Catholic Church. In 2005,
Rabbi David Kaye of Potomac resigned from
his job after allegedly trying to solicit
sex from minors online. It was part of an
undercover probe by the television show "Dateline
NBC." In 2006, two lawsuits alleged
that a Brooklyn Yeshiva knowingly harbored
a child molester.
It is easier for a camel to go through the
eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter
the kingdom of God. Matthew 19:24.
Between 1984 and 1987, James Bakker and his
wife each received annual salaries of $200,000
plus huge bonuses. Bakker was charged with
fraud, tax evasion, and racketeering and
sentenced to 45 years in prison. His associate,
Richard Dortch, senior vice-president of
PTL, also went to prison. Televangelist Robert
Tilton's paid television program, Success-N-Life,
aired in all 235 American TV markets. Tilton
taught that all of life's trials, especially
poverty, were a result of sin. When a person
made a vow to Tilton, Tilton preached that
God would reward the donor with vast material
riches. In 1991, ABC News reported that Tilton's
ministry threw away prayer requests without
reading them, keeping only money and valuables
sent by viewers. Investigations initiated
by the state of Texas and the Federal government
found nearly 10,000 pounds of prayer requests
and letters to the Tilton ministry in a disposal
bin at a Tulsa-area recycling firm.
Gerald Payne founded the Tampa-based Greater
Ministries International Church. In 2001
Payne received a 27 year prison sentence
for promising 18,000 Christian investors
that they would double their money through
"divinely-inspired investments."
Before his arrest on 19 counts of fraud,
conspiracy, money-laundering, and related
charges, Payne and his partners took in almost
$580 million. Brother Patrick Henry Talbert
of the Indianapolis Baptist Temple told his
audience, "God says give, and it shall
be given. You give a gift, we basically take
it offshore '" and we've been doing
this for nine years, nobody's ever lost a
dime '" and we multiply it back through
the body of Christ. ... We don't promise
you nothing. We just say nobody's lost a
dime in nine years, and we double everything."
In 1999, a federal grand jury indicted Talbert
and six others on charges of money laundering
and mail fraud.
According to the 20-count indictment, the
group's "Double Your Blessing"
and "Faith Promises" programs were
elaborate frauds that bilked thousands of
people for tens of millions of dollars. By
the mid-80s, Jimmy Swaggart's weekly "Jimmy
Swaggart Telecast" attracted eight million
viewers. He amassed great wealth, taking
in more than $150 million annually. George
W. Bush told the Palestinian Foreign Minister,
"God told me to invade Afghanistan and
Iraq." The pope nominated Mother Teresa
for sainthood a year after her death in 1997.
A "miracle" had to be attested.
Christopher Hitchens wrote, "Surely
any respectable Catholic cringes with shame
at the obviousness of the fakery. A Bengali
woman named Monica Besra claims that a beam
of light emerged from a picture of MT, which
she happened to have in her home, and relieved
her of a cancerous tumor. Her physician,
Dr. Ranjan Mustafi, says that she didn't
have a cancerous tumor in the first place
and that the tubercular cyst she did have
was cured by a course of prescription medicine.
Was he interviewed by the Vatican's investigators?
No."
Hitchens wrote that MT was a friend of poverty,
not of the poor. She said that suffering
was a gift from God. "She was a friend
to the worst of the rich, taking misappropriated
money from the atrocious Duvalier family
in Haiti (whose rule she praised in return)
and from Charles Keating." Keating received
a ten-year prison sentence for his part in
the savings and loan scandal. During the
course of his trial, she pleaded to the judge
for clemency.
Hitchens, noting that her global income was
more than enough to outfit several first
class clinics, and that she never published
an audit, asked what happened to the money.
He wrote, "The primitive hospice in
Calcutta was as run down when she died as
it always had been." He added that "The
decision not to do so... is a deliberate
one. The point is not the honest relief of
suffering, but the promulgation of a cult
based on death and suffering and subjection."
One of her volunteers described her "Home
for the Dying" as resembling photos
of concentration camps such as Belsen. No
chairs, just stretcher beds. Virtually no
medical care or painkillers beyond aspirin.
Hitchens noted that MT "checked into
some of the finest and costliest clinics
and hospitals in the West during her bouts
with heart trouble and old age." He
concluded, "Many more people are poor
and sick because of the life of MT: Even
more will be poor and sick if her example
is followed. She was a fanatic, a fundamentalist,
and a fraud."
Other People Also Get Messages From God
Voices told young mother Jennifer Cisowski
to test her faith in god by repeatedly slamming
her infant son to the ground and down a flight
of stairs. She said she believed he would
rise from the dead if her faith were strong
enough. Deanna Laney believed that god ordered
her to kill her children. She did. Teresa
Ann Archie shot her daughter after becoming
convinced the 16-year-old was possessed by
Satan. She told police Shavon's last words
were, "Mama, don't shoot me, I love
you." She replied, "I know, Baby,
but I have to do the Lord's will." Andrea
Yates received communications from God telling
her to kill her five children. So she made
them breakfast and then methodically drowned
each one. Lashuan Harris dropped her three
young boys over the railing on Pier 7 to
drown in San Francisco Bay. Her psychiatrist
testified that Harris believed God had told
her to put her boys into the Bay.
God sometimes commands people to commit mass
murders. George W. Bush told the Palestinian
Foreign Minister, "God told me to invade
Afghanistan and Iraq."
Points To Ponder (but not for long)
The first humans roamed the earth about 100,000
years ago. Why did god wait about 98,000
years before sending his messenger (Jesus,
Muhammad, Buddha)?
The ancient Greeks believed that the heavens
teemed with gods, and many of them were malicious.
Has new evidence emerged to justify the notion
of one exclusively benevolent being? Historian
Lord Acton wrote that "Power corrupts,
and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
He referred to politicians, but wouldn't
his warning apply to an omniscient, omnipotent
being? The Old Testament paints a decidedly
unflattering picture of god's character.
Consider the stories of Job and Abraham.
god took everything away from his faithful
servant Job--family, health, and possessions--just
to test whether Job would stay devoted. What
insecurity! In the Hebrew Bible, god asks
Abraham to sacrifice his son on Mount Moriah
and doesn't even deign to give a reason.
What a sadist!
The biblical god is superior to humans in
both strength and ability to create special
effects, so if he existed and we knew what
he wanted (directly, not via some power-
seeking evangelist claiming a pipeline),
it would behoove us to obey. Slaves do not
fare well who displease their masters. But
he's not a good role model. Willie Nelson
sang, "Mama Don't Let Your Babies Grow
Up to Be Cowboys." Humanitarian mamas
won't let them grow up to be god either.
People of deep faith are called god-fearing.
"The fear of the Lord is the beginning
of wisdom" (Prov. 1:7). Ponder that.
Fear of an all-loving being seems misplaced,
even ungrateful. Loving children of loving
parents aren't called parent-fearing. Yet
many true believers worship a god whose level
of tolerance is far below the standards of
most mothers.
Theologians argue that the world's evil can
be explained as the price for free will.
That raises a question. Does evil exist in
heaven? If not, then angels lack free will?
How about god herself? Does his existence
indicate the possibility of both free will
and total goodness? If so, god shouldn't
have rushed things. If he'd have taken eight
or nine days, he might have been able to
create creatures really in his image.
Even a supreme being may have occasional
lapses of attention. He must get excruciatingly
bored from watching day after uneventful
day as televangelists eke out their ascetic
lives and priests instruct altar boys. Oops,
bad examples. The point is that he may not
know what his creations will do at every
moment throughout eternity, and his small
gaps in knowledge may become chasms of ignorance.
He might miss a trivial insult that triggers
a murderous rampage or a bacterium that initiates
a deadly plague. On the other hand, if he
is always aware, always having us perform
precisely as choreographed, how can we be
faulted for bad behavior. Who deserves the
blame, he or Attila? Torquemada? Hitler?
Pol Pot? If an engineer built an automaton
that tortured and killed people, we would
consider the engineer to be either incompetent
or evil. Should worshippers hold god to a
lower standard?
Nobody who talks about life after death has
experienced it.
More than two billion Christians accept Jesus
as their savior, but the various Christian
denominations disagree on key points. More
than one billion Muslims follow the teachings
of Muhammad, and almost one billion Hindus
pray to many gods. Buddhists, Confucians,
Baha'is, Jains, Shintoists, and Sikhs together
total about 500,000,000 and have widely divergent
beliefs. So do about 100,000,000 Mormons,
Jews, Scientologists, Christian Scientists,
and the spunky Jehovah's Witnesses who ring
your doorbell with free copies of Watchtower
and Awake. Imagine a science fiction scenario
in which extraterrestrial beings land on
earth and assemble the leaders of all the
world's religions. Eager to know which is
correct, they give each leader two days to
make his or her case. What evidence would
they give? "God told me so." "It
says so in the bible." "On Easter
Sunday I bought a bushel of potatoes, and
one of them was the spitting image of the
Virgin Mary."
Many religious leaders argue that sex (at
least for others) should be indulged in only
for the purpose of procreation. Masturbation,
abortion, homosexuality, condoms, and premarital,
oral, and anal sex, are all sins. But if
procreation is the sole purpose'"if
god wanted to produce 7,000,000,000 of us'"why
didn't he do it all at once? With no birth
canal to navigate through, human heads and
therefore brain sizes could have been much
larger. Oh well, that may have reduced the
number of worshippers.
"When you understand why you dismiss
all the other possible gods, you will understand
why I dismiss yours." Stephen Roberts
The Persistence of Religious Faith
Religious beliefs, by which so many people
define themselves, are resistant to challenge.
Being disabused of the belief that Venice
is the capitol of Italy might embarrass but
probably not cause serious discomfort; being
disillusioned about deeply held religious
beliefs might devastate. Most religious people
are saved from devastation by Bible stories,
catechisms, and other lobotomizing techniques.
So, although children eventually outgrow
their beliefs in Santa and the tooth fairy,
maturity is, as often as not, associated
with increased religious fervor.
The Old Testament recounts an argument between
God and Satan. The devil claimed that Job
was a good man only because God had blessed
him with a loving family and material wealth.
So God, ever the Fair Minded Sportsman, granted
Satan permission to torment Job. Satan took
away his livestock and servants, caused the
deaths of his children, then afflicted him
with horrible skin sores. The cumulative
misfortunes finally wore him down and he
cursed the day he was born. His friend Elihu
cheered him up by explaining that God inflicts
pain so that the sufferer can fully appreciate
His love and forgiveness upon recovery. God
appeared to Job in the form of a whirlwind,
and Job acknowledged His unlimited power.
God, notoriously susceptible to flattery,
gave back Job's health and property and blessed
him with new children. The death of a loved
one or other tragedy may cause people to
question how God could be so cruel. Their
spiritual advisors, that is, the ones who
divvy up the proceeds from collection plates,
recount the warm, fuzzy story of Job. What
a deterrent to disbelief.
The inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah were
wicked, so God destroyed their cities. But
first He sent two angels to Lot, commanding
him and his family to flee. The angels said
to Lot, "Escape for thy life; look not
behind thee." Lot and his wife and daughters
hastened away, but Lot's wife looked back.
God, pissed off at such a horrible betrayal,
turned her into a pillar of salt. The message
is, "Don't question authority."
Believers are occasionally exposed to the
thoughts of doubt-provoking heathens. They
are reassured by the Creation story, a particularly
insidious neuron destroyer. Adam and Eve
lived a blissful existence in the Garden
of Eden until Satan, in the form of a serpent,
approached Eve and convinced her to eat from
the forbidden tree of knowledge (forbidden,
because God wanted to keep them ignorant).
Eve gave some of the fruit to Adam, and he
ate too. God eventually found out--apparently
even the omniscient are occasionally caught
napping--and His blood pressure soared. He
banished the miscreants from the garden.
The moral is clear: The more sensible-seeming
the heathen, the stronger must be the resistance.
Knowledge is the devil's work. Rationality
is evil. Apostasy is treason. Believers dare
not resolve the crisis by seeking meaningful
evidence. They must dismiss enigmas and anomalies
by recognizing that the Lord works in mysterious
ways (although every preacher in every tiny
church all over the world seems to know precisely
what He wants).
Summation
People of faith are told who created the
world, when He did it (in some religions,
to the day and almost always by a He), and
what happens when we die. Believers are taught
when to pray, how to dress, what not to eat,
which books to read, and the appropriate
circumstances and positions for having sex.
We humans take pride in the giant forebrain
that distinguishes us from other animals
by giving us the ability to think deeply.
Nevertheless, many people form their most
important beliefs as young children, before
that forebrain is fully developed. Later,
they speak with certainty about what happens
after we die and which one particular bible,
of the more than 1,000 available around the
world, speaks the literal truth. Answers
to such questions stumped the likes of Aristotle,
Einstein, and Bertrand Russell, yet these
people "know"-- typically within
a few years of being toilet trained and disabused
of the reality of Santa Claus but before
learning the multiplication table. Then they
ignore or even actively avoid information
that would challenge any of their long-held
beliefs. The more important the belief, the
more desperately a person clings to it despite
disconfirming evidence. People's overall
worldviews are especially resistant to change.
Religious faith does not require supporting
evidence. Faith is belief by decree. In the
beginning was THE WORD. The faithful know
the truth. Their bible, pastor, rabbi, imam,
or personal mystical experience tells them
so. Parents, having learned THE TRUTH from
their parents, pass it on to their children.
But parents and other teachers are fallible.
Their sources might have erred. Even if bibles
were inspired by miracles, they were transcribed
by fallible humans.
Bertrand Russell wrote, "When there
is evidence, no one speaks of faith. We do
not speak of faith that two and two are four
or that the earth is round. We only speak
of faith when we wish to substitute emotion
for evidence." In a similar vein, Ambrose
Bierce defined faith as "belief without
evidence in what is told by one who speaks,
without knowledge, of things without parallel."
Nietzsche defined faith as not wanting to
know what is true.
Faith is not merely belief in the absence
of evidence--it's belief despite evidence.
That's peculiar, as people normally seek
evidence whether serving on juries, investing
in stocks, or choosing nectarines. If new
evidence supplants the old, they typically
discard or amend their beliefs. If they bet
on a wrong horse, literally or figuratively,
they revise betting criteria. But charismatic
politicians and religious leaders have enriched
themselves by persuading constituents to
disregard intellect and sense.
|