One of the Largest and Most Visited Sources of Philosophical Texts on the Internet.

ESTABLISHED FOR TEN YEARS
1999 - 2009

SERVING YOU AND THE WORLD  PHILOSOPHICAL COMMUNITY
Evans Experientialism HOME    Evans Experientialism
SEARCH THE WHOLE SITE? SEARCH CLICK THE SEARCH BUTTON

Main Site Entrance

The Academy Library

The Athenaeum Library

The Nominalist Library
Athenaeum Reading Room

RELIGION, MATHEMATICS AND
PHILO - PSYCHOLOGICAL LET'S PRETEND
Jud Evans
Copyright © 2009 Jud Evans. Permission granted to distribute in any medium, commercial
or  non - commercial,  provided  author attribution  and copyright  notices  remain  intact.

Dualism is an essential component of a psycho-religious consolidatory control activity which is one of the most successful manipulation-mechanisms in the history of mankind.


                        RELIGION, MATHEMATICS AND PHILO-PSYCHOLOGIC LET’S PRETEND


Dualism is an essential component of a psycho-religious consolidatory control activity which is one of the most successful manipulation-mechanisms in the history of mankind. Dualism had its origins in human ignorance - a condition of the brain which is responsible for its current continuance. The doctrine that reality consists of two basic opposing elements, often taken to be mind and matter (or mind and body), or good and evil has its roots in animism (from Latin anima (soul, life) a philosophical, religious or spiritual idea that souls or spirits exist not only in humans and human artifacts like totems, crosses, fetishes, statues, and sacrificial stones and wells, but also in other animals, plants, rocks and natural phenomena such as volcanic eruptions, tsunami waves, floods, lightning and geographic features such as woodland groves, sacred mountains or rivers, or other entities of the compendium of man-made and natural objects that populated the environment in which man found himself.

As philosophers we call such primitive attitudes hylozoism which is the philosophical conjecture that all or some material things possess life, or that all life is inseparable from matter and that such beliefs are directed at an ignorant humanity in order to establish a behaviour supportive of the shamanistic or priestly objectives of hieratical domination via the fear and reverence of an imaginarium of gods and spirits with whom they act as self appointed intermediatories.

It is often said that when a man confronts an area of ignorance or a cognitive gap he is (perhaps evolutionarily) predetermined to fill it in, or at least has a tendency to acquiesce or respond positively to the suggestions of others who provide what seems to be a reasonable explanation for a given phenomena. In fact this often results in the supposition of brute ignorance with a more sophisticated ignorance. The dualistic explanations provided are imaginative and non-evidentiary and only reasoned in the sense that their acceptance installs the reasoners in positions of societal dominance, either as a sacerdotal theocratic hierarchy under a high priest (see modern Iran) or a god-king, (see 20th century Japan) or both.

Though in the societies of the developed world the dualistic beliefs of sacerdotal hierarchies under high priests are still shared amongst the ignorant masses, the worship of a god-king is nowadays less popular amongst the hoi polloi.

Historically it is true that until quite recently the twitching death-throes of some cultish rumps could still be seen around the world. They were usually centered upon deified living kings, emperors, and the religious incarnations of gods such as the Chinese pseudo-Christian leader Hong Xiuquan or the Korean Buddhist monk Gung-ye, King of Taebong.

In our modern era worship of the more well known Japanese emperor Hirohito (whose name was on the lips of the young Japanese troops as they charged to their death into battle during World War II and the worship of his descendants in modern Japan has gradually been abandoned by the educated young, the Dalai Lamas of Tibet continues to be revered by his devotees in that exotic but backward land as the rebirth of a long line of tulkus, who have chosen to be reborn in order to enlighten others.

Only the abstract gods remain supported as they are by the notion of the necessary dualisms that sustain them. Not only does humankind remain unrescued from this psycho-religious aberrancy, the virus of dualism has insinuated itself and become internalised by the masses and has become an acceptable feature of the physical correlates of the cognisant brain which has become infected with the most irrational of unphysical correspondences.

Leaving general science with reifications and its let's pretend correlates of time, motion, cause and change aside - even mathematics (often referred to as the King of Arts and the Queen of all Sciences) has become invaded by a monstrous imaginata of directly religious origin and provenance called sets which form a mental image of something that is not present or that is not the case that were initiated by Cantor and improvised from the ravings of a cult of Russian mystics known as Name Worshippers. [1] (Graham and Kantor. 2009. P. 2)

Though developed in the latter part of the nineteenth century, the methodologies of mystical Name Worshipping, which basically means: things can be created just by naming them (compare Alexius Meinong 1853 - 1920)) were introduced to and enthusiastically welcomed into the world of mathematics by the Russian religious heretics Nikolai Luzin, Dmitri Egorov and Pavel Florensky in the early part of the twentieth century.

Georg Cantor’s famous (infamous) statement about mathematical freedom had been like a breath of fresh air to the hereticate Slavic mystics:

...das Wesen der Mathematik liegt gerade in ihrer Freiheit (the essence of mathematics resides in its freedom) [2] (ibid. p. 96)


Accustomed as they were to the sets of hierarchical celestial beings who populate the categories and classes and sets of angelic existences in the De Coelesti Hierarchia, they saw the immediate benefit of Naming to a Cantorian freed, transcendentalist mathematics of their practice of naming God and his be-winged underlings and his miscellaneous sets of angels, archangels, cherubim and others with WORDS.

Such existentially wordified coelestial collections were claimed to exist in a number of religious traditions, including Christianity, Islam, Judaism, and Zoroastrianism and are apparently needed for the proper arrangement and understanding of the heavenly hierarchical structures which apparently brought such primitive abstractions into existence as real things in the minds of the faithful, could also serve to tidy up some ideative mathematical problems of proof (least of all with regard to the abstraction infinity) and would at the same time rescue mankind from the burgeoning materialist-determinism of analytic realism rather than the preferred transcendentalist Imaginational or intuitive science.

Angels are divided into three hierarchies each of which contains three orders. Their proximity to the Supreme Being serves as the basis of this division. In the first hierarchy he places the Seraphim, Cherubim, and Thrones; in the second, the Dominations, Virtues, and Powers; in the third, the Principalities, Archangels, and Angels. The only Scriptural names furnished of individual angels are Raphael, Michael, and Gabriel, names which signify their respective attributes. Apocryphal Jewish books, such as the Book of Enoch, supply those of Uriel and Jeremiel, while many are found in other apocryphal sources, like those Milton names in Paradise Lost"   [3] (answers. yahoo.)


Andrei Bely, student of the mathematicians Egorov and Bugaev and the classmate of Luzin and Florensky made the following statement on the power of naming:

           When I name an object with a word, I thereby assert its existence.

Does this apply both to mathematics and poetry? If the object is a new type of infinity, does that infinity exist just after you name it?      [4] (Graham/Kantor. 2009. P. 98)



Perhaps Bely was influenced by the words of his classmate Luzin who proclaimed:

We, in our mind, consider natural numbers objectively existing. We, in our mind, consider the totality of all natural numbers objectively existing. We, finally, consider the totality of all transfinite numbers of the Second Class objectively existing [5] (ibid. p. 99.)


Thus was the ontologically impure and religiously mystical introduced into mathematics and feloniously named pure mathematics. Thus what was becoming an increasingly discoverable very much un-mystical physical universe spoken of as representing the the mystical beauty of the mathematical universe.

Thus was academia invaded by a professoriate of religious naifs hysterically urging their students onward in a god-like nominatival-nomological creation of pseudo-mathematical entities. These are the juvenile products of let's pretend constructed by religious fanatics posing as mathematical scientists with which our young students of mathematics are being infected in our universities.

In spite of the ravings of the believers, patently there is no God to help western science and culture if it continues to rely on such worthless abstraction. As the religious majority of the west seem hypnotised by dualism in almost every aspect of its thinking (indeed in the very language with which it communicates) and appears content to sit on the ontological sidelines as western culture slips into the abyss of a false analyticity, to where or to whom, other than to scientists who have managed to liberate themselves from reification, must we turn to be rescued in our battle with the forces of the ignorant, the uneducated and the irredeemably brainwashed and those who lack a sufficient state of culture and quality of social development in both our own and in other societies.

References
[1] Graham. Loren. Kantor. Jean-Michel. Naming Infinity -The True Story of Religious Mysticism and Mathematical Creativity. 2009. P. 2. The Belnap Press. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London.
[2] (ibid. p. 96)
[3] Answers.http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index? qid=20080223130952AA8ZN7M
[4] Graham. Loren. Kantor. Jean-Michel. Naming Infinity – The True Story of Religious Mysticism and Mathematical Creativity. 2009. P. 98. The Belnap Press. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London.

[5] Ibid.

BACK TO THE LIBRARY
BACK TO TOP OF PAGE