 |
What Buddhists Believe
IN SEVENTEEN WEB-PAGE PARTS WEB-PAGE ELEVEN
Chapter 11 |
K.Sri Dhammananda
Venerable Dhammananda was born on March 18,
1919 to the family of Mr. K.A. Garmage in
the village of Kirinde, Matara in southern
Ceylon. Like most children born during the
British colonial period, he was given the
English name of Martin. He was the eldest
in a family of three brothers and three sisters
|
Part Four Human Life in Society
Chapter 11
Life and Culture
Traditions, Customs and Festivals
Buddhism is open to traditions and customs
provided they are not harmful to the welfare
of others.
The Buddha advised us not to believe in anything
simply because it is the traditional custom.
However, we are not advised to suddenly do
away with all traditions. 'You must try to
experiment with them and put them thoroughly
to test. If they are reasonable and conducive
both to your happiness and to the welfare
of others, only then should you accept and
practise these traditions and customs.' (Kalama
Sutta) This is certainly one of the most
liberal declarations ever made by any religious
teacher. This tolerance of other's traditions
and customs is not known to some other religionists.
These religionists usually advise their new
converts to give up all their traditions,
customs and culture without observing whether
they are good or bad. While preaching the
Dhamma, Buddhist missionaries have never
advised the people to give up their traditions
as long as they are reasonable. But the customs
and traditions must be within the framework
of religious principles. In other words,
one should not violate the religious precepts
in order to follow one's traditions. If people
are very keen to follow their own traditions
which have no religious value at all, they
can do so provided that they do not practise
these traditions in the name of religion.
Even then, such practices must be harmless
to oneself and to all other living creatures.
Rites and Rituals
These are included within customs and traditions.
The rites and rituals are an ornamentation
or a decoration to beautify a religion in
order to attract the public. They provide
a psychological help to some people. But
one can practise religion without any rites
and rituals. Certain rites and rituals that
people consider as the most important aspect
of their religion for their salvation are
not considered as such in Buddhism. According
to the Buddha, one should not cling to such
practices for his spiritual development or
mental purity.
Festivals
Genuine and sincere Buddhists do not observe
Buddhist festivals by enjoying themselves
under the influence of liquor and merry-making
or holding feasts by the slaughtering of
animals. The true Buddhists observe festival
days in an entirely different manner. On
the particular festival day, they would devote
their time to abstaining from all evil. They
would practise charity and help others to
relieve themselves from their suffering.
They may entertain friends and relatives
in a respectable way.
The festivals that have been incorporated
with religion sometimes could pollute the
purity of a religion. On the other hand a
religion without festivals can become very
dull and lifeless to many people. Usually
children and youths come to religion through
religious festivals. To them the attraction
of a religion is based on its festivals.
However, to a mediator, festivals can become
a nuisance.
Of course, some people will not be satisfied
with religious observances only during a
festival . They naturally like to have some
sort of merry-making and outward show. Rites,
rituals, ceremonies, processions and festivals
are organized to quench that thirst for emotional
satisfaction through religion. No one can
say that such practices are wrong, but devotees
have to organize those ceremonies in a cultured
manner, without causing a nuisance to others.
Buddhism and Women
A female child may prove even to be a better
offspring than a male.
Women's position in Buddhism is unique. The
Buddha gave women full freedom to participate
in a religious life. The Buddha was the first
religious Teacher who gave this religious
freedom to women. Before the Buddha, women's
duties had been restricted to the kitchen;
women were not even allowed to enter any
temple or to recite any religious scripture.
During the Buddha's time, women's position
in society was very low. The Buddha was criticized
by the prevailing establishment when He gave
this freedom to women. His move to allow
women to enter the Holy Order was extremely
radical for the times. Yet the Buddha allowed
women to prove themselves and to show that
they too had the capacity like men to attain
the highest position in the religious way
of life by attaining Arahantahood. Every
woman in the world must be grateful to the
Buddha for showing them the real religious
way of living and for giving such freedom
to them for the first time in world history.
A good illustration of the prevailing attitude
towards women during the Buddha's time is
found in these words of Mara:
'No woman, with the two-finger wisdom (narrow)which
is hers, could ever hope to reach those heights
which are attained only by the sages.'
Undoubtedly, the Buddha was vehement in contradicting
such attitude. The nun (bhikkhuni) to whom
Mara addressed these words, gave the following
reply:
'When one's mind is well concentrated and
wisdom never fails, does the fact of being
a woman make any difference?'
King Kosala was very disappointed when he
heard that his Queen had given birth to a
baby girl. He had expected a boy. To console
the sad King, the Buddha said:
'A female child, O Lord of men, may prove
Even a better offspring than a male.
For she may grow up wise and virtuous,
Her husband's mother reverencing, true wife,
The boy that she may bear may do great deeds,
And rule great realms, yes, such a son
Of noble wife becomes his country's guide,'
(Samyutta Nikaya)
The Buddha has confirmed that man is not
always the only wise one; woman is also wise.
Nowadays many religionists like to claim
that their religions give women equal rights.
We only have to look at the world around
us today to see the position of women in
many societies. It seems that they have no
property rights, are discriminated in various
fields and generally suffer abuse in many
subtle forms. Even in western countries,
women like the Suffragettes had to fight
very hard for their rights. According to
Buddhism, it is not justifiable to regard
women as inferior. The Buddha Himself was
born as a woman on several occasions during
His previous births in Samsara and even as
a women He developed the noble qualities
and wisdom until He gained Enlightenment
or Buddhahood.
Buddhism and Politics
The Buddha had gone beyond all worldly affairs,
but still gave advice on good government.
The Buddha came from a warrior caste and
was naturally brought into association with
kings, princes and ministers. Despite His
origin and association, He never resorted
to the influence of political power to introduce
His teaching, nor allowed His Teaching to
be misused for gaining political power. But
today, many politicians try to drag the Buddha's
name into politics by introducing Him as
a communist, capitalist, or even an imperialist.
They have forgotten that the new political
philosophy as we know it really developed
in the West long after the Buddha's time.
Those who try to make use of the good name
of the Buddha for their own personal advantage
must remember that the Buddha was the Supremely
Enlightened One who had gone beyond all worldly
concerns.
There is an inherent problem of trying to
intermingle religion with politics. The basis
of religion is morality, purity and faith,
while that for politics is power. In the
course of history, religion has often been
used to give legitimacy to those in power
and their exercise of that power. Religion
was used to justify wars and conquests, persecutions,
atrocities, rebellions, destruction of works
of art and culture.
When religion is used to pander to political
whims, it has to forego its high moral ideals
and become debased by worldly political demands.
The thrust of the Buddha Dhamma is not directed
to the creation of new political institutions
and establishing political arrangements.
Basically, it seeks to approach the problems
of society by reforming the individuals constituting
that society and by suggesting some general
principles through which the society can
be guided towards greater humanism, improved
welfare of its members, and more equitable
sharing of resources.
There is a limit to the extent to which a
political system can safeguard the happiness
and prosperity of its people. No political
system, no matter how ideal it may appear
to be, can bring about peace and happiness
as long as the people in the system are dominated
by greed, hatred and delusion. In addition,
no matter what political system is adopted,
there are certain universal factors which
the members of that society will have to
experience: the effects of good and bad kamma,
the lack of real satisfaction or everlasting
happiness in the world characterized by dukkha(unsatisfactoriness),
anicca(impermanence), andanatta(egolessness).
To the Buddhist, nowhere in Samsara is there
real freedom, not even in the heavens or
the world of Brahama.
Although a good and just political system
which guarantees basic human rights and contains
checks and balances to the use of power is
an important condition for a happy in society,
people should not fritter away their time
by endlessly searching for the ultimate political
system where men can be completely free,
because complete freedom cannot be found
in any system but only in minds which are
free. To be free, people will have to look
within their own minds and work towards freeing
themselves from the chains of ignorance and
craving. Freedom in the truest sense is only
possible when a person uses Dhamma to develop
his character through good speech and action
and to train his mind so as to expand his
mental potential and achieve his ultimate
aim of enlightenment.
While recognizing the usefulness of separating
religion from politics and the limitations
of political systems in bringing about peace
and happiness, there are several aspects
of the Buddha's teaching which have close
correspondence to the political arrangements
of the present day. Firstly, the Buddha spoke
about the equality of all human beings long
before Abraham Lincoln, and that classes
and castes are artificial barriers erected
by society. The only classification of human
beings, according to the Buddha, is based
on the quality of their moral conduct. Secondly,
the Buddha encouraged the spirit of social
-co-operation and active participation in
society. This spirit is actively promoted
in the political process of modern societies.
Thirdly, since no one was appointed as the
Buddha's successor, the members of the Order
were to be guided by the Dhamma and Vinaya,
or in short, the Rule of Law. Until today
very member of the Sangha is to abide by
the Rule of Law which governs and guides
their conduct.
Fourthly, the Buddha encouraged the spirit
of consultation and the democratic process.
This is shown within the community of the
Order in which all members have the right
to decide on matters of general concern.
When a serious question arose demanding attention,
the issues were put before the monks and
discussed in a manner similar to the democratic
parliamentary system used today. This self-governing
procedure may come as a surprise to many
to learn that in the assemblies of Buddhists
in India
2,500 years and more ago are to be found
the rudiments of the parliamentary practice
of the present day. A special officer similar
to 'Mr. Speaker' was appointed to preserve
the dignity of the Parliamentary Chief Whip,
was also appointed to see if the quorum was
secured. Matters were put forward in the
form of a motion which was open to discussion.
In some cases it was done once, in others
three times, thus anticipating the practice
of Parliament in requiring that a bill be
read a third time before it becomes law.
If the discussion showed a difference of
opinion, it was to be settled by the vote
of the majority through balloting.
The Buddhist approach to political power
is the moralization and the responsible use
of public power. The Buddha preached non-violence
and peace as a universal message. He did
not approve of violence or the destruction
of life, and declared that there is no such
thing as a 'just' war. He taught: 'The victor
breeds hatred, the defeated lives in misery.
He who renounces both victory and defeat
is happy and peaceful.' Not only did the
Buddha teach non-violence and peace, He was
perhaps the first and only religious teacher
who went to the battlefield personally to
prevent the outbreak of a war. He diffused
tension between the Sakyas and the Koliyas
who were about to wage war over the waters
of Rohini. He also dissuaded King Ajatasattu
from attacking the Kingdom of the Vajjis.
The Buddha discussed the importance and the
prerequisites of a good government. He showed
how the country could become corrupt, degenerate
and unhappy when the head of the government
becomes corrupt and unjust. He spoke against
corruption and how a government should act
based on humanitarian principles.
The Buddha once said, 'When the ruler of
a country is just and good, the ministers
become just and good; when the ministers
are just and good, the higher officials become
just and good; when the higher officials
are just and good, the rank and file become
just and good; when the rank and file become
just and good, the people become just and
good.'(Anguttara Nikaya)
In the Cakkavatti Sihananda Sutta, the Buddha
said that immorality and crime, such as theft,
falsehood, violence, hatred, cruelty, could
arise from poverty. Kings and governments
may try to suppress crime through punishment,
but it is futile to eradicate crimes through
force.
In the Kutadanta Sutta, the Buddha suggested
economic development instead of force to
reduce crime. The government should use the
country's resources to improve the economic
conditions of the country. It could embark
on agricultural and rural development, provide
financial support to entrepreneurs and business,
provide adequate wages for workers to maintain
a decent life with human dignity.
In the Jataka, the Buddha had given to rules
for Good Government, known as 'Dasa Raja
Dharma'. These ten rules can be applied even
today by any government which wishes to rule
the country peacefully. The rules are as
follows:
be liberal and avoid selfishness, maintain
a high moral character, be prepared to sacrifice
one's own pleasure for the well-being of
the subjects, be honest and maintain absolute
integrity, be kind and gentle, lead a simple
life for the subjects to emulate, be free
from hatred of any kind, exercise non-violence,
practise patience, and respect public opinion
to promote peace and harmony. Regarding the
behavior of rulers, He further advised: A
good ruler should act impartially and should
not be biased and discriminate between one
particular group of subjects against another.
A good ruler should not harbor any form of
hatred against any of his subjects. A good
ruler should show no fear whatsoever in the
enforcement of the law, if it is justifiable.
A good ruler must possess a clear understanding
of the law to be enforced. It should not
be enforced just because the ruler has the
authority to enforce the law. It must be
done in a reasonable manner and with common
sense.
(Cakkavatti Sihananda Sutta) In the Milinda
Panha, it is stated: 'If a man, who is unfit,
incompetent, immoral, improper, unable and
unworthy of kingship, has enthroned himself
a king or a ruler with great authority, he
is subject to be tortured? to be subject
to a variety of punishment by the people,
because, being unfit and unworthy, he has
placed himself unrighteously in the seat
of sovereignty. The ruler, like others who
violate and transgress moral codes and basic
rules of all social laws of mankind, is equally
subject to punishment; and moreover, to be
censured is the ruler who conducts himself
as a robber of the public.' In a Jataka story,
it is mentioned that a ruler who punishes
innocent people and does not punish the culprit
is not suitable to rule a country.
The king always improves himself and carefully
examines his own conduct in deeds, words
and thoughts, trying to discover and listen
to public opinion as to whether or not he
had been guilty of any faults and mistakes
in ruling the kingdom. If it is found that
he rules unrighteously, the public will complain
that they are ruined by the wicked ruler
with unjust treatment, punishment, taxation,
or other oppressions including corruption
of any kind, and they will react against
him in one way or another. On the contrary,
if he rules righteously they will bless him:
'Long live His Majesty.' (Majjhima Nikaya)
The Buddha'semphasis on the moral duty of
a ruler to use public power to improve the
welfare of the people had inspired Emperor
Asoka in the Third Century B. C. to do likewise.
Emperor Asoka, a sparkling example of this
principle, resolved to live according to
and preach the Dhamma and to serve his subjects
and all humanity. He declared his non-aggressive
intentions to his neighbors, assuring them
of his goodwill and sending envoys to distant
kings bearing his message of peace and non-aggression.
He promoted the energetic practice of the
socio-moral virtues of honesty, truthfulness,
compassion, benevolence, non-violence, considerate
behavior towards all, non-extravagance, non-acquisitiveness,
and non-injury to animals. He encouraged
religious freedom and mutual respect for
each other's creed. He went on periodic tours
preaching the Dhamma to the rural people.
He undertook works of public utility, such
as founding of hospitals for men and animals,
supplying of medicine, planting of roadside
trees and groves, digging of wells, and construction
of watering sheds and rest houses. He expressly
forbade cruelty to animals.
Sometimes the Buddha is said to be a social
reformer. Among other things, He condemned
the caste system, recognized the equality
of people, spoke on the need to improve socio-economic
conditions, recognized the importance of
a more equitable distribution of wealth among
the rich and the poor, raised the status
of women, recommended the incorporation of
humanism in government and administration,
and taught that a society should not be run
by greed but with consideration and compassion
for the people. Despite all these, His contribution
to mankind is much greater because He took
off at a point which no other social reformer
before or ever since had done, that is, by
going to the deepest roots of human ill which
are found in the human mind. It is only in
the human mind that true reform can be effected.
Reforms imposed by force upon the external
world have a very short life because they
have no roots. But those reforms which spring
as a result of the transformation of man's
inner consciousness remain rooted. While
their branches spread outwards, they draw
their nourishment from an unfailing source
_the subconscious imperatives of the life-stream
itself. So reforms come about when men's
minds have prepared the way for them, and
they live as long as men revitalize them
out of their own love of truth, justice and
their fellow men.
The doctrine preached by the Buddha is not
one based on 'Political Philosophy'. Nor
is it a doctrine that encourages men to worldly
pleasures. It sets out a way to attain Nibbana.
In other words, its ultimate aim is to put
an end to craving (Tanha) that keeps them
in bondage to this world. A stanza from the
Dhammapada best summarizes this statement:
'The path that leads to worldly gain is one,
and the path that leads to Nibbana(by leading
a religious life)is another.' However, this
does not mean that Buddhists cannot or should
not get involved in the political process,
which is a social reality. The lives of the
members of a society are shaped by laws and
regulations, economic arrangements allowed
within a country, institutional arrangements,
which are influenced by the political arrangements
of that society. Nevertheless, if a Buddhist
wishes to be involved in politics, he should
not misuse religion to gain political powers,
nor is it advisable for those who have renounced
the worldly life to lead a pure, religious
life to be actively involved in politics.
|